Ivan Sterling

721 citations
19 papers · 365 indexed · h-index 9

Ivan Sterling

18 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Ivan Sterling
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Geometry and Topology 226
  • Applied Mathematics 254
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 89
  • Mathematical Physics 60
  • Algebra and Number Theory 20
Replace Udo Hertrich-Jeromin with:
Udo Hertrich-Jeromin Austria
Lucas Hsu United States
Goo Ishikawa Japan
Steen Markvorsen Denmark
John Douglas Moore United States
Irina Markina Norway
Lorenzo Nicolodi Italy
Francis E. Burstall United Kingdom
L. M. Woodward United Kingdom
Pierre Molino France
Ivan Sterling relative to Udo Hertrich-Jeromin Austria Udo Hertrich-Jeromin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Udo Hertrich-Jeromin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Sterling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Sterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Sterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Sterling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Sterling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Sterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Sterling. The network helps show where Ivan Sterling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Ivan Sterling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivan Sterling Line = papers co-authored together Ivan Sterling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20162
2 201412
3 20123
4 20092
5 200415
6 20025
7
Running Out of Ice?: Polar bears need plenty of it.
20003
8 19942
9 19934
10 199326
11 199247
12 1989122
13 198839
14 198735
15 198721
16 19870
17 198618
18 19856
19 19843

About Ivan Sterling

Ivan Sterling is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics, Theoretical Computer Science, Mathematical Physics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 19 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (11 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (5 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (3 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (2 papers) and 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (226 citations), Applied Mathematics (254 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (89 citations), Mathematical Physics (60 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (20 citations). Ivan Sterling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Pinkall, Hermann Karcher, Franz Pedit, Dirk Ferus, Wu-Yi Hsiang, Nicolas Schmitt, Josef F. Dorfmeister and Thomas Ivey. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Inventiones mathematicae, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) and manuscripta mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026