William Eamon
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- History top 1%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pamela O. LongGünther M. KeilEdward Peters
- Topics
- History of Science and Medicine (5 papers)History of Medicine Studies (4 papers)Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryTechnology and Culture
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Eamon
17 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- History and Philosophy of Science 149
- History 103
- Anthropology 83
- Economics and Econometrics 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 41
Countries citing papers authored by William Eamon
This map shows the geographic impact of William Eamon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Eamon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Eamon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Eamon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Eamon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Eamon. The network helps show where William Eamon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Eamon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Eamon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Eamon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Eamon. William Eamon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Physicians and the reform of popular culture in early modern Europe | 1 |
| 5 | Spain and the Scientific Revolution: Historiographical Questions and Conjectures | 2 |
| 6 | Pharmaceutical self-fashioning or how to get rich and famous in the Renaissance medical marketplace. | 5 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 145 | |
| 13 | 124 | |
| 14 | "Plebs amat empirica": Nicholas of Poland and his critique of the mediaeval medical establishment. | 5 |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | Books of secrets in medieval and early modern science. | 6 |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About William Eamon
William Eamon is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Archeology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (5 papers), History of Medicine Studies (4 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (149 citations), History (103 citations) and Anthropology (83 citations). William Eamon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Pamela O. Long, Günther M. Keil and Edward Peters. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Technology and Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.