Ann M. Blair
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Trevor CookLodi NautaMiguel Á. GranadaPeter HarrisonJohn P. DoyleDavid A. LinesDermot MoranJill Kraye
- Topics
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers)
- Journals
- Renaissance and ReformationDigital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ann M. Blair
10 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Literature and Literary Theory 77
- History 60
- History and Philosophy of Science 54
- Anthropology 46
- Sociology and Political Science 44
Countries citing papers authored by Ann M. Blair
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann M. Blair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann M. Blair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann M. Blair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann M. Blair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann M. Blair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann M. Blair. The network helps show where Ann M. Blair may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann M. Blair
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann M. Blair. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann M. Blair based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann M. Blair. Ann M. Blair is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 183 | |
| 4 | Too Much to Know | 12 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | Errata Lists and the Reader as Corrector | 3 |
| 8 | Historia in Theodor Zwinger's Theatrum Humanae Vitae | 1 |
| 9 | Annotating and Indexing Natural Philosophy | 12 |
| 10 | The Practices of Erudition According to Morhof | 0 |
| 11 | La persistance du latin comme langue de science à la fin de la Renaissance | 2 |
| 12 | Bibliothèques portables: les recueils de lieux communs dans la Renaissance tardive | 1 |
About Ann M. Blair
Ann M. Blair is a scholar working on Classics, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (77 citations) and Classics (23 citations). Ann M. Blair has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Trevor Cook, Lodi Nauta, Miguel Á. Granada, Peter Harrison, John P. Doyle, David A. Lines, Dermot Moran, Jill Kraye, Christopher S. Celenza and Brian P. Copenhaver. Their work appears in journals such as Renaissance and Reformation, Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.