William E. Cole

30 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

William E. Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Architecture 6
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24
  • Urban Studies 16
  • Economics and Econometrics 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
Replace Richard Kazis with:
Richard Kazis
Kartik Roy Australia
Jean Fourastié France
Jane Tooke United Kingdom
Richard E. Lonsdale United States
Lars Mjøset Norway
L. Neville Brown United Kingdom
Ian Boxill Jamaica
Jürgen Weller Chile
Jesús Pérez Mayo Spain
William E. Cole relative to Richard Kazis Richard Kazis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard Kazis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Cole. The network helps show where William E. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Cole Line = papers co-authored together William E. Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197180
2 196448
3 201519
4 199117
5 198312
6
The Economics of Total Quality Management: Clashing Paradigms in the Global Market
199511
7 198710
8 19699
9 19949
10 19946
11 19716
12 19565
13
Social foundations of education
19684
14 20094
15 19944
16 19794
17 19663
18 19683
19 20002
20 20202

About William E. Cole

William E. Cole is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Architecture, Media Technology and Strategy and Management, having authored 34 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Engineering Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers) and Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (6 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (24 citations), Urban Studies (16 citations), Economics and Econometrics (69 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (106 citations). William E. Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Jerome H. Skolnick, Elliott Currie, Robert C. Wood, Bichaka Fayissa, Richard D. Sanders, Albert O. Hirschman, Chris Doran, Brian Newman, James L. Guth and Edward J. Larson. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, American Sociological Review, World Development, Journal of Economic Issues and The Planetary Science Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact