Elliott Currie

32 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers

Elliott Currie
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Sociology and Political Science 697
  • General Health Professions 208
  • Clinical Psychology 145
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 96
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
Replace Richard A. Ball with:
Richard A. Ball United States
Diana S. Richmond Garland United Kingdom
Thomas G. Blomberg United States
Phil Scraton United Kingdom
Marjorie S. Zatz United States
Jeffrey Ian Ross United States
Jeffrey Reiman United States
J. Robert Lilly United States
Coretta Phillips United Kingdom
Clifford R. Shaw United States
Elliott Currie relative to Richard A. Ball United States Richard A. Ball's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Richard A. Ball · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elliott Currie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elliott Currie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliott Currie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliott Currie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elliott Currie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliott Currie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliott Currie. The network helps show where Elliott Currie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elliott Currie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elliott Currie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elliott Currie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elliott Currie. Elliott Currie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 10
4 31
5
An Economy Run by Criminals: Reflections on Gregg Barak's Theft of a Nation
1
6 10
7
Thinking about criminology
2
8 8
9 10
10 4
11
Radical Criminology or Just Criminology - Then, and Now
1
12
Reflections on Crime and Criminology at the Millennium
10
13 9
14
What Works with Juvenile Offenders - A Review of Graduated Sanction Programs
2
15 17
16 11
17 226
18 80
19 10
20 37

About Elliott Currie

Elliott Currie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (7 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (697 citations), General Health Professions (208 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (96 citations). Elliott Currie has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Charles F. Wellford, Lynn Zimmer, Jerome H. Skolnick, William E. Cole, Henry N. Pontell, Troy Duster, Martín Carnoy, Stewart Macaulay, Tim Goddard and Richard D. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026