William D. McIntosh
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen M. SmithDoris G. BazziniBrandon J. SchmeichelAlison ScottLeonard L. MartinThomas F. HarlowAbraham TesserConstance J. Pilkington
- Topics
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (9 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (7 papers)Media Influence and Health (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Individual DifferencesAddictive Behaviors
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
William D. McIntosh
26 papers receiving 642 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Clinical Psychology 236
- Social Psychology 197
- Sociology and Political Science 192
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 175
- Gender Studies 139
Countries citing papers authored by William D. McIntosh
This map shows the geographic impact of William D. McIntosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. McIntosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. McIntosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William D. McIntosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. McIntosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. McIntosh. The network helps show where William D. McIntosh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. McIntosh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. McIntosh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. McIntosh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William D. McIntosh. William D. McIntosh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | The Breakup of Romantic Relationships: Situational Predictors of Perception of Recovery | 24 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 87 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 56 |
About William D. McIntosh
William D. McIntosh is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Marketing, having authored 27 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (9 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (7 papers) and Media Influence and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (88 citations), Gender Studies (139 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (175 citations). William D. McIntosh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. Smith, Doris G. Bazzini, Brandon J. Schmeichel, Alison Scott, Leonard L. Martin, Thomas F. Harlow, Abraham Tesser, Constance J. Pilkington, John D. Murray and Bryan L. Dawson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Addictive Behaviors.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.