Amy Hackney

665 total citations
24 papers, 418 citations indexed

About

Amy Hackney is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Hackney has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 418 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Amy Hackney's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). Amy Hackney is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). Amy Hackney collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Canada. Amy Hackney's co-authors include Margaret Jean Intons-Peterson, Tara West, Paola Rocchi, Michael E. Pyle, John S. Luque, Krista Mincey, Shannon Rauch, Richard L. Wiener, Lorraine Warren and Lawrence Locker and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Applied Psychology and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Amy Hackney

23 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy Hackney United States	11	162	114	91	85	77	24	418
Laura Boyd Farmer United States	8	141 0.9×	150 1.3×	67 0.7×	185 2.2×	113 1.5×	17	434
Rory MacLean United Kingdom	10	155 1.0×	94 0.8×	88 1.0×	155 1.8×	150 1.9×	30	505
S. Christianson Sweden	6	184 1.1×	54 0.5×	111 1.2×	86 1.0×	70 0.9×	14	381
J. Clare Wilson United Kingdom	10	172 1.1×	111 1.0×	115 1.3×	199 2.3×	203 2.6×	22	507
Santa Parrello Italy	11	50 0.3×	69 0.6×	86 0.9×	159 1.9×	157 2.0×	52	322
Jennifer M. Batterman-Faunce United States	7	287 1.8×	26 0.2×	102 1.1×	254 3.0×	267 3.5×	7	590
Katherine Ketcham United States	7	199 1.2×	38 0.3×	95 1.0×	158 1.9×	198 2.6×	9	522
Geert Vervaeke Belgium	12	71 0.4×	230 2.0×	157 1.7×	133 1.6×	318 4.1×	59	572
Cari Gillen‐O’Neel United States	10	65 0.4×	115 1.0×	246 2.7×	151 1.8×	169 2.2×	14	576
Cynthia M. Torges United States	9	41 0.3×	162 1.4×	162 1.8×	212 2.5×	154 2.0×	10	564

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Hackney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Hackney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Hackney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Hackney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Hackney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Hackney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Hackney. The network helps show where Amy Hackney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Hackney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Hackney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Hackney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Hackney. Amy Hackney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Hansen, Andrew R., et al.. (2019). Weight Misperception and Cigarette Smoking among Healthy Weight Adolescents in the U. S: NHANES 2005–2014. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse. 28(5). 323–330. 2 indexed citations

2.

Snook, Kassandra, Andrew R. Hansen, Carmen H. Duke, Amy Hackney, & Jian Zhang. (2018). Notice of Retraction and Replacement. Snook et al. Change in percentages of adults with overweight or obesity trying to lose weight, 1988-2014. JAMA. 2017;317(9):971-973. JAMA. 320(23). 2485–2485. 2 indexed citations

3.

Vitacco, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Relations among psychopathy, moral competence, and moral intuitions in student and community samples. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 23(2). 117–134. 6 indexed citations

4.

Hackney, Amy, et al.. (2017). The effects of perspective taking on empathy-related responses for college students higher in callous traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 119. 86–91. 6 indexed citations

5.

Mincey, Krista, et al.. (2015). The Influence of Masculinity on Coping in Undergraduate Black Men. The Journal of Men s Studies. 23(3). 315–330. 13 indexed citations

6.

McCutcheon, Lynn E., Jean E. Bartels, Amy Hackney, Jason Hart, & Shannon Rauch. (2014). Social Psychology for Today’s World. 1 indexed citations

7.

Mincey, Krista, et al.. (2014). Being a Black Man: Development of the Masculinity Inventory Scale (MIS) for Black Men. The Journal of Men s Studies. 22(3). 167–179. 16 indexed citations

8.

Hackney, Amy & Jack Glaser. (2013). Reverse deterrence in racial profiling: Increased transgressions by nonprofiled Whites.. Law and Human Behavior. 37(5). 348–353. 5 indexed citations

9.

Mincey, Krista, et al.. (2013). Understanding Masculinity in Undergraduate African American Men. American Journal of Men s Health. 8(5). 387–398. 15 indexed citations

10.

Hackney, Amy & Matteo Cinelli. (2011). Are Older Adults' Actions Affected by Their Perceptions When Walking Through Apertures?. Journal of Vision. 11(11). 911–911. 1 indexed citations

11.

Hackney, Amy, et al.. (2011). The relationship between psychopathic traits and attachment behavior in a non-clinical population. Personality and Individual Differences. 51(5). 584–588. 38 indexed citations

12.

Goodboy, Alan K., et al.. (2010). Are Celebrities Charged with Murder Likely to Be Acquitted. North American journal of psychology. 12(3). 625–636. 5 indexed citations

13.

Locker, Lawrence, et al.. (2010). The Breakup of Romantic Relationships: Situational Predictors of Perception of Recovery. North American journal of psychology. 12(3). 565–578. 24 indexed citations

14.

Hackney, Amy & Jack Glaser. (2009). Reverse Deterrence in Racial Profiling: Increased Transgressions by the Non-Profiled Group. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

15.

Wiener, Richard L., et al.. (2004). Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 10(4). 516–576. 27 indexed citations

16.

Wiener, Richard L., et al.. (2002). The fit and implementation of sexual harassment law to workplace evaluations.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4). 747–764. 25 indexed citations

17.

Wiener, Richard L., et al.. (2002). The psychology of telling murder stories: do we think in scripts, exemplars, or prototypes?. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 20(1-2). 119–139. 11 indexed citations

18.

Intons-Peterson, Margaret Jean, et al.. (1999). Age, testing at preferred or nonpreferred times (testing optimality), and false memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 25(1). 23–40. 75 indexed citations

19.

Intons-Peterson, Margaret Jean, et al.. (1999). Age, testing at preferred or nonpreferred times (testing optimality), and false memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 25(1). 23–40. 54 indexed citations

20.

Intons-Peterson, Margaret Jean, et al.. (1998). "Aging, optimal testing times, and negative priming": Correction.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 24(4). 844–844. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact