William D. Brooks

623 citations
26 papers · 338 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William D. Brooks

21 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

William D. Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Language and Linguistics 53
  • Social Psychology 100
  • Literature and Literary Theory 48
  • Communication 23
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Margaret Rose with:
Margaret Rose Australia
Tim Grant United Kingdom
Mark Smith United States
David Little United Kingdom
Diana George United States
Alfred G. Smith United States
Mark Brooke Singapore
Angela Chan Hong Kong
Nancy Morris United States
Michael J. Hyde United States
William D. Brooks relative to Margaret Rose Australia Margaret Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Margaret Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Brooks. The network helps show where William D. Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside William D. Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William D. Brooks Line = papers co-authored together William D. Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Methods of research in communication
197096
2 195972
3 197033
4 195125
5 195424
6 196815
7 197212
8
Teaching speech communication in the secondary school
19738
9 20098
10 19768
11 19667
12 19696
13 19675
14 19704
15 19724
16 19714
17 19712
18 19712
19 19701
20 19691

About William D. Brooks

William D. Brooks is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education, Communication, Language and Linguistics and Philosophy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (5 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (1 paper), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (1 paper), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper) and Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (53 citations), Social Psychology (100 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations), Communication (23 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). William D. Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include K. D. Bagshawe, Charles R. Gruner, Charles R. Petrie, James W. Gibson, Anthony P. Fletcher, Gustav W. Friedrich, Kenneth S. Robson, M. J. Davidson, D. W. Smithers and Charles E. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication, The Lancet, Communication Education, Thorax and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact