Diana George

106 total papers · 835 total citations
38 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Diana George is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Education and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana George has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 5 papers in Education and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Diana George's work include Literacy, Media, and Education (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers). Diana George is often cited by papers focused on Literacy, Media, and Education (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers). Diana George collaborates with scholars based in United States. Diana George's co-authors include John Trimbur, Alicia Ostriker, Marilyn M. Cooper, Frederick W. Luthardt, Michael A. McNutt, Arthur Vogel, Donald R. VanDevanter, Bruce McComiskey, Nancy Grimm and Susan Sanders and has published in prestigious journals such as College Composition and Communication, Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics and Cultural Studies.

In The Last Decade

Diana George

24 papers receiving 202 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Diana George 146 90 52 40 33 38 321
Bettina Kümmerling‐Meibauer 156 1.1× 101 1.1× 57 1.1× 36 0.9× 49 1.5× 39 274
Peter Hunt 178 1.2× 73 0.8× 70 1.3× 23 0.6× 17 0.5× 30 351
Patricia Enciso 157 1.1× 195 2.2× 93 1.8× 25 0.6× 39 1.2× 34 349
Christian W. Chun 177 1.2× 89 1.0× 62 1.2× 94 2.4× 40 1.2× 28 325
Peter Mortensen 97 0.7× 76 0.8× 91 1.8× 13 0.3× 18 0.5× 29 250
Zohar Shavit 139 1.0× 65 0.7× 77 1.5× 130 3.3× 14 0.4× 27 357
Laura Gonzales 106 0.7× 48 0.5× 63 1.2× 40 1.0× 12 0.4× 40 300
Suzanne S. Choo 88 0.6× 250 2.8× 115 2.2× 14 0.3× 21 0.6× 34 330
Patricia A. Sullivan 118 0.8× 62 0.7× 57 1.1× 26 0.7× 5 0.2× 36 307
Clare Bradford 238 1.6× 70 0.8× 139 2.7× 10 0.3× 17 0.5× 64 350

Countries citing papers authored by Diana George

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana George's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana George with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana George more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana George

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana George. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana George. The network helps show where Diana George may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana George

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana George. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana George based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana George. Diana George is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026