William Cooper

47 papers receiving 863 citations

Peers

William Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 652
  • Global and Planetary Change 534
  • Ecological Modeling 74
  • Developmental Biology 27
  • Family Practice 20
Replace T. R. Halliday with:
T. R. Halliday United Kingdom
Michele A. Johnson United States
Joshua J. Amiel Australia
Thomas J. Hossie Canada
Nancy L. Staub United States
Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar Germany
George Middendorf United States
Anne C. Crook United Kingdom
Breanna J. Putman United States
Mara Evans United States
William Cooper relative to T. R. Halliday United Kingdom T. R. Halliday's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
T. R. Halliday · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cooper. The network helps show where William Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cooper Line = papers co-authored together William Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986129
2 2000105
3 199092
4 198892
5 199143
6 200435
7 199634
8 200827
9 200227
10 199925
11 199723
12 201121
13 201020
14 200020
15 200219
16 200018
17 200917
18 200916
19 200916
20 200214

About William Cooper

William Cooper is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (29 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (28 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (652 citations), Global and Planetary Change (534 citations), Ecological Modeling (74 citations), Developmental Biology (27 citations) and Family Practice (20 citations). William Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Laurie J. Vitt, Steven D. Schwartz, Timothy J. Griffin, Valentín Pérez‐Mellado, Philip M. Salzberg, Janalee P. Caldwell, Wade C. Sherbrooke, Alfredo Salvador, Pílar López and Troy A. Baird. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Zoology, Amphibia-Reptilia, Behaviour, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact