Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Phase II Randomized Double-Masked Trial of Pegaptanib, an Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aptamer, for Diabetic Macular Edema
2005454 citationsSteven D. Schwartz et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to Steven D. Schwartz Steven D. Schwartz (= 1×)
peers
Robert J. Klein
Countries citing papers authored by Steven D. Schwartz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven D. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven D. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven D. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven D. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven D. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven D. Schwartz. The network helps show where Steven D. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven D. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven D. Schwartz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven D. Schwartz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steven D. Schwartz. Steven D. Schwartz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Heilweil, Gad, et al.. (2011). Increased Ischemic Index Correlates with Neovascularization in Diabetic Retinopathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 1037–1037.1 indexed citations
10.
Kaines, Andrew, et al.. (2010). Normative Data for Macular Thickness and Volume Measurements Using Cirrus HD-Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 338–338.1 indexed citations
11.
Prasad, Pradeep, Irena Tsui, Gad Heilweil, Jean‐Pierre Hubschman, & Steven D. Schwartz. (2010). Ischemic Index for the Quantification of Retinal Non-Perfusion in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 285–285.1 indexed citations
12.
Kaines, Andrew, Irena Tsui, David Sarraf, & Steven D. Schwartz. (2009). Utility of Ultra Wide Field Fluorescein Angiography in Evaluation and Management of Uveitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 3573–3573.1 indexed citations
13.
Coffee, Robert E., Scott C. N. Oliver, Steven D. Schwartz, & Thomas R. Friberg. (2009). The Development of an Ischemic Index for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema with Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopic Ultra Wide Field Angiographic Imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 5271–5271.
Gupta, Aditya, et al.. (2003). Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Evaluation of Sclerotomies Created by Transconjunctival 25 Gauge Vitrectomy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 3008–3008.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.