William Cain

41 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

William Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Computer Science Applications 96
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 273
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 362
  • Condensed Matter Physics 120
Replace Stefan Küchemann with:
Stefan Küchemann Germany
Sebastian Brückner Germany
Jonte Bernhard Sweden
Ïlbilge Dökme Türkiye
Osamu Takeuchi Japan
Scott Daniel Australia
Junjie Gavin Wu China
Jianwei Zhang China
Dongjo Shin South Korea
J. Mirecki Millunchick United States
William Cain relative to Stefan Küchemann Germany Stefan Küchemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Stefan Küchemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cain. The network helps show where William Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cain Line = papers co-authored together William Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990106
2 199697
3 202382
4 201465
5 198748
6 198744
7 199131
8 198827
9 201319
10 201519
11 201618
12 198914
13 201614
14 199411
15 201410
16 20209
17 20189
18 20148
19 19908
20 20237

About William Cain

William Cain is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Computer Science Applications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 46 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (13 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (10 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (96 citations), Health Informatics (24 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (273 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (362 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (120 citations). William Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include M.H. Kryder, John Bell, A. P. Payne, R. Hempstead, Punya Mishra, Danah Henriksen, W. H. Meiklejohn, Neil Smith, J. O. Artman and A. Layadi. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, TechTrends, Journal of Applied Physics, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal and College English.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact