Willem J. Heiser
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 1%
- Co-authors
- Véronique De GuchtPatrick J. F. GroenenJacqueline J. MeulmanPhilip SpinhovenKim de JongAnnet NugterBenjamin FischlerFrank Busing
- Topics
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (19 papers)Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (14 papers)Multi-Criteria Decision Making (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumSpain
In The Last Decade
Willem J. Heiser
84 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
- Clinical Psychology 517
- Psychiatry and Mental health 463
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 426
- Artificial Intelligence 355
- Statistics and Probability 345
Countries citing papers authored by Willem J. Heiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Willem J. Heiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willem J. Heiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willem J. Heiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Willem J. Heiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willem J. Heiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willem J. Heiser. The network helps show where Willem J. Heiser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Willem J. Heiser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Willem J. Heiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Willem J. Heiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Willem J. Heiser. Willem J. Heiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 176 | |
| 9 | 180 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 244 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 74 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Multidimensional mapping of preference data | 26 |
About Willem J. Heiser
Willem J. Heiser is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Statistics and Probability and General Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (19 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (14 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (53 citations), Statistics and Probability (345 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (426 citations). Willem J. Heiser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Véronique De Gucht, Patrick J. F. Groenen, Jacqueline J. Meulman, Philip Spinhoven, Kim de Jong, Annet Nugter, Benjamin Fischler, Frank Busing, Wilma C. M. Resing and Claire E. Stevenson. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrics, Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.