Antonio D’Ambrosio

1.9k total citations
77 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Antonio D’Ambrosio is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Antonio D’Ambrosio has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 10 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 8 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Antonio D’Ambrosio's work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers). Antonio D’Ambrosio is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Criteria Decision Making (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers). Antonio D’Ambrosio collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and Belarus. Antonio D’Ambrosio's co-authors include Massimo Aria, Alfonso Montella, Filomena Mauriello, Roberta Siciliano, Mariano Pernetti, Francesco Galante, Italo Francesco Angelillo, A. D'Alessandro, Francesco Napolitano and Willem J. Heiser and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Antonio D’Ambrosio

63 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Antonio D’Ambrosio
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 342
  • Social Psychology 150
  • Building and Construction 143
  • Artificial Intelligence 138
  • Molecular Biology 134
Replace Kim‐Anh Do with:
Kim‐Anh Do United States
Hongxia Li China
Yifang Ma China
Emil Pitkin United States
John D. Kelleher Ireland
Saptarshi Mandal India
Yi Hui China
Duane Steffey United States
Robert E. Roth United States
David Soler Spain
Kim‐Anh Do United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Antonio D’Ambrosio
Antonio D’Ambrosio · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Antonio D’Ambrosio
Antonio D’Ambrosio · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Antonio D’Ambrosio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio D’Ambrosio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio D’Ambrosio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio D’Ambrosio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio D’Ambrosio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio D’Ambrosio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio D’Ambrosio. The network helps show where Antonio D’Ambrosio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antonio D’Ambrosio

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antonio D’Ambrosio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antonio D’Ambrosio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antonio D’Ambrosio. Antonio D’Ambrosio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 3
5 1
6 14
7 11
8 12
9 16
10 4
11 6
12 5
13 89
14 6
15 30
16 5
17 27
18 15
19 111
20
Arule e bruciaprofumi fittili da Pompei
5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026