Mark de Rooij
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Philip SpinhovenBrenda W.J.H. PenninxAlbert M. van HemertCarolien RieffeBernet M. ElzingaSerge A.R.B. RomboutsWouter D. WeedaP. Michiel Westenberg
- Topics
- Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers)Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (10 papers)
- Journals
- NatureJournal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark de Rooij
80 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
- Clinical Psychology 872
- Cognitive Neuroscience 553
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 464
- Social Psychology 281
- Psychiatry and Mental health 262
Countries citing papers authored by Mark de Rooij
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark de Rooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark de Rooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark de Rooij more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark de Rooij
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark de Rooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark de Rooij. The network helps show where Mark de Rooij may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark de Rooij
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark de Rooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark de Rooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark de Rooij. Mark de Rooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | 168 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 140 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Cognitions in prolonged exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder | 21 |
About Mark de Rooij
Mark de Rooij is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Statistics and Probability and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (872 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (464 citations). Mark de Rooij has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip Spinhoven, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Albert M. van Hemert, Carolien Rieffe, Bernet M. Elzinga, Serge A.R.B. Rombouts, Wouter D. Weeda, P. Michiel Westenberg, Caroline L. Bokhorst and Anne C. Miers. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Neuroscience and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.