Wen‐Po Chuang
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 19
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Virus Research Studies 9
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 6
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 4
-
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research 3
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 6
-
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies 3
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- C. Michael SmithGerard S. RodziewiczSwayamjit RayDawn S. LutheGary W. FeltonFlor E. AcevedoMichelle PeifferGregg A. Howe
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Wen‐Po Chuang
43 papers receiving 683 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Insect Science 362
- Plant Science 376
- Horticulture 4
- Endocrinology 20
- Neurology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Wen‐Po Chuang
This map shows the geographic impact of Wen‐Po Chuang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wen‐Po Chuang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wen‐Po Chuang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wen‐Po Chuang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wen‐Po Chuang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wen‐Po Chuang. The network helps show where Wen‐Po Chuang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wen‐Po Chuang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 57 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 19 | Successful Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Induced by Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty | 2008 | 1 |
| 20 | Phosphorylcholine-coated Dexamethasone Eluting Stent in the Prevention of Restenosis: A Randomized Trial in a Single Hospital | 2007 | 3 |
About Wen‐Po Chuang
Wen‐Po Chuang is a scholar working on Insect Science, Endocrinology and Plant Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (9 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers) and Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (362 citations), Plant Science (376 citations) and Horticulture (4 citations). Wen‐Po Chuang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include C. Michael Smith, Gerard S. Rodziewicz, Swayamjit Ray, Dawn S. Luthe, Gary W. Felton, Flor E. Acevedo, Michelle Peiffer, Gregg A. Howe, Marco Herde and Anjel M. Helms. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.