Mark Leys

2.0k citations
83 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Leys

70 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Leys
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Rehabilitation 306
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 78
  • General Health Professions 284
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 137
Replace Steve George with:
Steve George United Kingdom
A.M.J. Chorus Netherlands
Donna Fitzpatrick‐Lewis Canada
Sietske J. Tamminga Netherlands
John Lowman United States
Meredith Wallace United States
Kristie Carter New Zealand
Neda Mehrdad Iran
Conrad Kobel Australia
Matthias Hünger Germany
Mark Leys relative to Steve George United Kingdom Steve George's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Steve George · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Leys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Leys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Leys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Leys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Leys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Leys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Leys. The network helps show where Mark Leys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Leys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Leys Line = papers co-authored together Mark Leys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005135
2 2009109
3 201196
4 201678
5 200676
6 200657
7 200748
8 200345
9 200844
10 201336
11 201335
12 201933
13 200631
14 201926
15 200324
16 200922
17 200921
18 202019
19 200518
20 200618

About Mark Leys

Mark Leys is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation, Economics and Econometrics and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (306 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (78 citations), General Health Professions (284 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (47 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (137 citations). Mark Leys has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Irina Cleemput, Corentin Fontaine, Nicolas Dendoncker, Rik De Vreese, Chris De Laet, Nancy Thiry, Mattias Neyt, Koen Putman, W. Jenni and Eddy Dejaeger. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Integrated Care, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, European Journal of Public Health, Ecosystem Services and Stroke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026