W. G. Huff
Impact in
-
- Global trade and economics
- Development top 5%
- International Development and Aid
Papers in
-
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 13
- Asian Studies and History 11
- Australian History and Society 2
-
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 2
- Co-authors
- Donald R. Snodgrass (1 shared paper)John Ermisch (1 shared paper)Christine Oughton (2 shared papers)Simon C. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Economic History Review (4 papers)World Development (3 papers)The Journal of Asian Studies (2 papers)Explorations in Economic History (1 paper)The Journal of Development Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGhana
In The Last Decade
W. G. Huff
22 papers receiving 448 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 111
- Development 34
- Sociology and Political Science 354
- Political Science and International Relations 156
- Urban Studies 34
Countries citing papers authored by W. G. Huff
This map shows the geographic impact of W. G. Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. G. Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. G. Huff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. G. Huff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. G. Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. G. Huff. The network helps show where W. G. Huff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside W. G. Huff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 117 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 111 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 98 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 79 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 8 | |
| 16 | The impact of colonialism on Burmese economic development | 1971 | 6 |
| 17 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 3 |
About W. G. Huff
W. G. Huff is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Accounting, having authored 23 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Socioeconomic Development in Asia (13 papers), Asian Studies and History (11 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (1 paper) and Asian Industrial and Economic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (111 citations), Development (34 citations), Sociology and Political Science (354 citations), Political Science and International Relations (156 citations) and Urban Studies (34 citations). W. G. Huff has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Snodgrass, John Ermisch, Christine Oughton and Simon C. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, World Development, The Journal of Asian Studies, Explorations in Economic History and The Journal of Development Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.