Simon C. Smith

671 citations
51 papers · 237 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Simon C. Smith

47 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Simon C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Finance 78
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 39
  • Economics and Econometrics 71
  • Development 8
  • Anthropology 21
Replace Willem H. Boshoff with:
Willem H. Boshoff South Africa
Frans Buelens Belgium
Jacques Fontanel France
Carola Westermeier Germany
M. Fabricio Perez Canada
Rush Doshi United States
Christer Ljungwall Sweden
Çağatay Bircan United Kingdom
Chris C. Carvounis United States
Soo‐Bin Park Canada
Simon C. Smith relative to Willem H. Boshoff South Africa Willem H. Boshoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Willem H. Boshoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon C. Smith. The network helps show where Simon C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Simon C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Simon C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202031
2 202125
3 201821
4 200415
5 199713
6 200410
7 19958
8 20198
9
Kuwait, 1950-1965: Britain, the al-Sabah, and Oil
19998
10 20067
11 20186
12 20066
13 20156
14 20175
15 20225
16 19974
17 19954
18 20214
19 20243
20 20193

About Simon C. Smith

Simon C. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Finance, having authored 51 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (14 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (9 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (9 papers), Asian Studies and History (7 papers), Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (6 papers) and Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (78 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (39 citations), Economics and Econometrics (71 citations), Development (8 citations) and Anthropology (21 citations). Simon C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Dominican Republic. Frequent co-authors include Allan Timmermann, John D. Fair, Martin Spott, Paul Fearnhead, Idris A. Eckley, W. G. Huff, Yinchu Zhu, Jonathan H. Wright, Alexander L. Wolman and Gianni Amisano. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History, Contemporary British History, Middle Eastern Studies, International Review of Financial Analysis and Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact