John C. Pope
Impact in
- Urology top 0.1%
- Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
-
- Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John W. BrockMark C. AdamsJohn C. ThomasStacy T. TanakaRomano T. DeMarcoIekuni IchikawaBradley P. KroppRichard C. Rink
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (100 papers)Journal of Pediatric Urology (10 papers)Urology (7 papers)Speculum (5 papers)Current Urology Reports (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndia
In The Last Decade
John C. Pope
152 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Urology 2.2k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.7k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 436
- Rheumatology 666
- Surgery 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Pope
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Pope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Pope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Pope. The network helps show where John C. Pope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 133 | |
| 13 | Eight Old English poems | 2001 | 22 |
| 14 | 1999 | 154 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 119 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 35 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 41 | |
| 20 | Homilies of Ælfric : a supplementary collection, being twenty-one full homilies of his middle and later career for the most part not previously edited with some shorter pieces, mainly passages added to the second and third series | 1967 | 3 |
About John C. Pope
John C. Pope is a scholar working on Urology, Classics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, having authored 159 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (78 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (53 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (23 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (22 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (18 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (12 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (12 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (2.2k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.7k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (436 citations), Rheumatology (666 citations) and Surgery (1.6k citations). John C. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include John W. Brock, Mark C. Adams, John C. Thomas, Stacy T. Tanaka, Romano T. DeMarco, Iekuni Ichikawa, Bradley P. Kropp, Richard C. Rink, Douglass B. Clayton and F. Douglas Stephens. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Journal of Pediatric Urology, Urology, Speculum and Current Urology Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.