Vikram Boolchand

733 total citations
9 papers, 177 citations indexed

About

Vikram Boolchand is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Vikram Boolchand has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 177 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 6 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Vikram Boolchand's work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers). Vikram Boolchand is often cited by papers focused on Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers). Vikram Boolchand collaborates with scholars based in United States. Vikram Boolchand's co-authors include Amitabh Chak, Gregory S. Cooper, Gregory Olds, Pankaj Singh, Richard E. Sampliner, Seth D. Crockett, Isaac M. Lipkus, Nicholas J. Shaheen, Kenneth K. Wang and Lori S. Lutzke and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Vikram Boolchand

7 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Vikram Boolchand United States	4	120	112	92	43	24	9	177
Nicolas Tinton Belgium	6	78 0.7×	50 0.4×	135 1.5×	17 0.4×	20 0.8×	10	169
Philippe Houcke France	4	79 0.7×	85 0.8×	67 0.7×	23 0.5×	29 1.2×	18	125
Mahesh Jayanna Australia	6	247 2.1×	194 1.7×	128 1.4×	25 0.6×	46 1.9×	11	283
Jamie Barbour United Kingdom	4	119 1.0×	118 1.1×	43 0.5×	18 0.4×	18 0.8×	7	141
Moniek Verstegen Netherlands	7	125 1.0×	59 0.5×	138 1.5×	22 0.5×	9 0.4×	14	181
Kenichi Mochizuki Japan	5	167 1.4×	89 0.8×	139 1.5×	11 0.3×	24 1.0×	15	204
C. Marmo Italy	6	153 1.3×	152 1.4×	120 1.3×	7 0.2×	53 2.2×	28	223
Edwin van der Zaag Netherlands	3	44 0.4×	95 0.8×	91 1.0×	19 0.4×	5 0.2×	7	146
John N. Groen Netherlands	6	107 0.9×	98 0.9×	65 0.7×	10 0.2×	52 2.2×	7	162
Hemchand Ramberan United States	7	231 1.9×	131 1.2×	124 1.3×	19 0.4×	71 3.0×	10	254

Countries citing papers authored by Vikram Boolchand

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vikram Boolchand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vikram Boolchand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vikram Boolchand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vikram Boolchand

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vikram Boolchand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vikram Boolchand. The network helps show where Vikram Boolchand may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vikram Boolchand

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vikram Boolchand. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vikram Boolchand based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vikram Boolchand. Vikram Boolchand is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Crockett, Seth D., Isaac M. Lipkus, Richard E. Sampliner, et al.. (2011). Overutilization of endoscopic surveillance in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a multicenter study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 75(1). 23–31.e2. 41 indexed citations

2.

Gaddam, Srinivas, Patrick Young, Amy Wang, et al.. (2010). M1104 Predicting High-Grade Dysplasia (HGD) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Patients With Non-Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus (BE): Results From a Large, Multicenter Cohort Study. Gastroenterology. 138(5). S–333. 3 indexed citations

3.

Esquivel, Romeo F., et al.. (2008). The Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus in Veteran Patients with and Without GERD Symptoms Undergoing Outpatient Colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 67(5). AB172–AB172. 3 indexed citations

4.

Boolchand, Vikram & Richard E. Sampliner. (2007). Risk for cancer in Barrett’s esophagus: Medical versus surgical therapy. Current Gastroenterology Reports. 9(3). 189–194. 1 indexed citations

5.

Boolchand, Vikram & Gregory S. Cooper. (2007). Colorectal Screening after Polypectomy. Annals of Internal Medicine. 146(11). 820–821.

6.

Boolchand, Vikram, Ashley L. Faulx, Ananya Das, et al.. (2006). Primary care physician attitudes toward endoscopic screening for GERD symptoms and unsedated esophagoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 63(2). 228–233. 15 indexed citations

7.

Boolchand, Vikram, et al.. (2006). Colorectal Screening after Polypectomy: A National Survey Study of Primary Care Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. 145(9). 654–659. 109 indexed citations

8.

Boolchand, Vikram, et al.. (2005). Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 100. S384–S385. 5 indexed citations

9.

Olds, Gregory, Pankaj Singh, Stacie Vela, et al.. (2004). Do Stents Reduce the Diagnostic Yield of EUS-FNA in Malignant Strictures?. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 59(5). P230–P230.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact