Countries where authors publish in Current Gastroenterology Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Gastroenterology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Gastroenterology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Gastroenterology Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Gastroenterology Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Gastroenterology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Gastroenterology Reports.
About Current Gastroenterology Reports
The 1.6k papers published in Current Gastroenterology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 35.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Gastroenterology Reports usually cover Gastroenterology (453 papers), Hepatology (226 papers) and Surgery (865 papers) specifically the topics of Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (221 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (193 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (192 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Gastroenterology Reports are Samuel B. Ho, Young S. Kim, Eldon A. Shaffer, Walter Coyle, Satish S.C. Rao, George Sachs, Shahid Umar, Jai Moo Shin, Daniel Hollander and Nancy F. Crum‐Cianflone.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.