Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces
19921.6k citationsVictoria Bellotti et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Bellotti
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Bellotti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Bellotti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Bellotti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Bellotti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Bellotti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Bellotti. The network helps show where Victoria Bellotti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Bellotti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Bellotti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Bellotti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Bellotti. Victoria Bellotti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mohan, Shiwali, Matthew Klenk, & Victoria Bellotti. (2019). Exploring How to Personalize Travel Mode Recommendations For Urban Transportation..2 indexed citations
3.
Liao, Q. Vera, Victoria Bellotti, & G. Michael Youngblood. (2016). Improvising Harmony. 2. 159–169.4 indexed citations
4.
Carroll, John M. & Victoria Bellotti. (2015). Preface to the special issue on Peer-to-Peer Exchange and the Sharing Economy: Analysis, Designs, and Implications. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.5 indexed citations
Bellotti, Victoria, Jim Thornton, Alvin Chin, Diane J. Schiano, & Nathan Good. (2007). TV-ACTA: Embedding an Activity-Centered Interface for Task Management in Email..12 indexed citations
11.
Jones, William, Jared M. Spool, Jonathan Grudin, Victoria Bellotti, & Mary Czerwinski. (2007). "Get real!". 1913–1916.4 indexed citations
12.
Schiano, Diane J., Ame Elliott, & Victoria Bellotti. (2006). Tokyo youth at leisure. 309–314.2 indexed citations
13.
Whittaker, Steve, Victoria Bellotti, & Paul Moody. (2005). Revisiting and reinventing email. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).8 indexed citations
14.
Edwards, W. Keith, Victoria Bellotti, Anind K. Dey, & Mark Newman. (2003). Stuck in the Middle: The Challenges of User-Centered Design and Evaluation for Infrastructure. Human Factors in Computing Systems. 297–304.43 indexed citations
Bellotti, Victoria, et al.. (1991). Generating good design questions.3 indexed citations
19.
MacLean, Allan, Victoria Bellotti, & Richard M. Young. (1990). What rationale is there in design. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 207–212.17 indexed citations
20.
Bellotti, Victoria. (1990). A framework for assessing applicability of HCI techniques. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 213–218.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.