Mitchell A. Medow

14 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Mitchell A. Medow
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Health Information Management 126
  • Health Informatics 23
  • General Decision Sciences 30
  • Family Practice 32
  • Medical Terminology 3
Replace Yalini Senathirajah with:
Yalini Senathirajah United States
Heidi Kramer United States
Juliane E. Kämmer Germany
Natalie C. Benda United States
Curtis L. Cole United States
Markus A. Feufel Germany
Guido Gatti United States
Martina A. Clarke United States
V. L. Patel United States
Sameer Malhotra United States
Mitchell A. Medow relative to Yalini Senathirajah United States Yalini Senathirajah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Yalini Senathirajah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell A. Medow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell A. Medow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell A. Medow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell A. Medow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell A. Medow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell A. Medow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell A. Medow. The network helps show where Mitchell A. Medow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell A. Medow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell A. Medow Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell A. Medow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2004143
2 201284
3 200776
4 201145
5 200642
6 200225
7
Internal medical residents' ability to diagnose and characterize major depression.
199920
8 200810
9
Cognitive debiasing through sparklines in clinical data displays.
200710
10 20019
11 20108
12
Investigating Resuscitation Code Assignment in the Intensive Care Unit using Structured and Unstructured Data.
20102
13 20011
14 20081

About Mitchell A. Medow

Mitchell A. Medow is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Family Practice, Health Information Management, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (126 citations), Health Informatics (23 citations), General Decision Sciences (30 citations), Family Practice (32 citations) and Medical Terminology (3 citations). Mitchell A. Medow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sharon Schweikhart, Victoria A. Shaffer, Hal R. Arkes, Catherine R. Lucey, Edgar C. Merkle, Kelly J. Kelleher, Harrison G. Weed, Deena J. Chisolm and David E. Schuller. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Decision Making, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Journal of General Internal Medicine, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Evidence-Based Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact