Daniel Kobewka

51 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Daniel Kobewka
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 68
  • Family Practice 27
  • Emergency Medicine 117
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 52
  • General Health Professions 247
Replace David J. Shulkin with:
David J. Shulkin United States
Giulio Toccafondi Italy
Peter E. Wu Canada
Jill Ashman United States
Nancy L. Dawson United States
Marcelo Coca Perraillon United States
Emanuele Di Simone Italy
Shaunta’ M. Ray United States
Ruth Ester Assayag Batista Brazil
K. Bruce Bayley United States
Daniel Kobewka relative to David J. Shulkin United States David J. Shulkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
David J. Shulkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kobewka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kobewka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kobewka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kobewka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kobewka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kobewka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kobewka. The network helps show where Daniel Kobewka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Kobewka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Kobewka Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Kobewka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201476
2 200757
3 201554
4 201647
5 201845
6 201835
7 201733
8 201830
9 201627
10 201922
11 201820
12 201919
13 201617
14 201916
15 200715
16 202014
17 202011
18 201711
19 202110
20 202310

About Daniel Kobewka

Daniel Kobewka is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medicine and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (24 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (18 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (13 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (68 citations), Family Practice (27 citations), Emergency Medicine (117 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (52 citations) and General Health Professions (247 citations). Daniel Kobewka has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Alan J. Forster, Paul E. Ronksley, Sunita Mulpuru, Carl van Walraven, Kednapa Thavorn, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Peter Tanuseputro, Ruthven N.A.H. Lewis, Ronald N. McElhaney and John McKay. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Journal of Vascular Surgery, BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact