Victoria A. Roach

520 total citations
28 papers, 364 citations indexed

About

Victoria A. Roach is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Victoria A. Roach has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 364 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 10 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Victoria A. Roach's work include Anatomy and Medical Technology (16 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (7 papers). Victoria A. Roach is often cited by papers focused on Anatomy and Medical Technology (16 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (7 papers). Victoria A. Roach collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Victoria A. Roach's co-authors include Timothy D. Wilson, James H. Kryklywy, Derek Mitchell, Graham Fraser, Daniel J. Belliveau, Stefanie M. Attardi, Charles L. Rice, Michael G. Brandt, Ngan Nguyen and Corey C. Moore and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Victoria A. Roach

23 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Victoria A. Roach United States 13 210 172 90 79 67 28 364
Jan‐Maarten Luursema Netherlands 11 242 1.2× 286 1.7× 141 1.6× 73 0.9× 46 0.7× 25 399
Ngan Nguyen United States 7 202 1.0× 138 0.8× 68 0.8× 54 0.7× 50 0.7× 21 302
Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali Singapore 12 294 1.4× 222 1.3× 48 0.5× 99 1.3× 79 1.2× 35 539
Rebecca S. Lufler United States 10 305 1.5× 221 1.3× 65 0.7× 211 2.7× 64 1.0× 20 451
Samet Kapakin Türkiye 7 135 0.6× 146 0.8× 185 2.1× 28 0.4× 16 0.2× 18 401
Christian Bellemare Canada 9 125 0.6× 70 0.4× 61 0.7× 73 0.9× 54 0.8× 29 315
Sandra Berney Switzerland 5 74 0.4× 56 0.3× 62 0.7× 30 0.4× 54 0.8× 6 426
Noor Christoph Netherlands 5 87 0.4× 97 0.6× 124 1.4× 24 0.3× 8 0.1× 10 326
Paul Rea United Kingdom 13 208 1.0× 268 1.6× 86 1.0× 68 0.9× 7 0.1× 68 576
Carla A. Romney United States 8 198 0.9× 139 0.8× 45 0.5× 111 1.4× 44 0.7× 12 313

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria A. Roach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria A. Roach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria A. Roach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria A. Roach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria A. Roach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria A. Roach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria A. Roach. The network helps show where Victoria A. Roach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria A. Roach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria A. Roach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria A. Roach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria A. Roach. Victoria A. Roach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Laura, Leslie A. Hoffman, Kirsten Brown, et al.. (2025). An audit of AI-related documents across U.S. medical schools: A framework-based qualitative content analysis. Medical Teacher. 48(3). 493–505.
2.
4.
Callahan, Rose E., et al.. (2022). The effect of an attending versus neutral observer on peg transfer and intracorporeal knot-tying laparoscopic tasks. Surgery. 172(5). 1352–1357. 1 indexed citations
5.
Attardi, Stefanie M., Douglas J. Gould, Rebecca L. Pratt, & Victoria A. Roach. (2021). YouTube‐based course orientation videos delivered prior to matriculation fail to alleviate medical student anxiety about anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 15(4). 685–697. 14 indexed citations
6.
Roach, Victoria A. & Stefanie M. Attardi. (2021). Twelve tips for applying Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance to optimize online teaching. Medical Teacher. 44(8). 859–865. 13 indexed citations
7.
Kryklywy, James H., Victoria A. Roach, & Rebecca M. Todd. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of tablet-based simulations for learning pseudo-surgical instrumentation. PLoS ONE. 16(1). e0245330–e0245330. 6 indexed citations
8.
9.
Roach, Victoria A., et al.. (2020). An early introduction to surgical skills: Validating a low-cost laparoscopic skill training program purpose built for undergraduate medical education. The American Journal of Surgery. 221(1). 95–100. 11 indexed citations
10.
Baker, Dustin, et al.. (2020). Analysis of Instrument Motion and the Impact of Residency Level and Concurrent Distraction on Laparoscopic Skills. Journal of surgical education. 78(1). 265–274. 1 indexed citations
11.
Roach, Victoria A., Misa Mi, Rebecca S. Lufler, et al.. (2020). Correlating Spatial Ability With Anatomy Assessment Performance: A Meta‐Analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education. 14(3). 317–329. 46 indexed citations
12.
Roach, Victoria A., Graham Fraser, James H. Kryklywy, Derek Mitchell, & Timothy D. Wilson. (2018). Guiding Low Spatial Ability Individuals through Visual Cueing: The Dual Importance of Where and When to Look. Anatomical Sciences Education. 12(1). 32–42. 29 indexed citations
13.
Roach, Victoria A., Graham Fraser, James H. Kryklywy, Derek Mitchell, & Timothy D. Wilson. (2017). Time limits in testing: An analysis of eye movements and visual attention in spatial problem solving. Anatomical Sciences Education. 10(6). 528–537. 16 indexed citations
14.
Roach, Victoria A., et al.. (2016). Changing the Learning Curve in Novice Laparoscopists: Incorporating Direct Visualization into the Simulation Training Program. Journal of surgical education. 74(1). 30–36. 12 indexed citations
15.
Roach, Victoria A., Graham Fraser, James H. Kryklywy, Derek Mitchell, & Timothy D. Wilson. (2015). The eye of the beholder: Can patterns in eye movement reveal aptitudes for spatial reasoning?. Anatomical Sciences Education. 9(4). 357–366. 19 indexed citations
16.
Roach, Victoria A., et al.. (2014). Head to head: The role of academic competition in undergraduate anatomical education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 8(5). 404–412. 52 indexed citations
17.
Roach, Victoria A., et al.. (2013). Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix. Anatomical Sciences Education. 6(6). 393–403. 27 indexed citations
18.
Roach, Victoria A., et al.. (2013). Application of Stereoscopic Visualization on Surgical Skill Acquisition in Novices. Journal of surgical education. 70(5). 563–570. 44 indexed citations
19.
Roach, Victoria A., et al.. (2013). Spatial visualization ability and laparoscopic skills in novice learners: Evaluating stereoscopic versus monoscopic visualizations. Anatomical Sciences Education. 7(4). 295–301. 17 indexed citations
20.
Roach, Victoria A., Michael G. Brandt, Corey C. Moore, & Timothy D. Wilson. (2012). Is three‐dimensional videography the cutting edge of surgical skill acquisition?. Anatomical Sciences Education. 5(3). 138–145. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026