Verena Mainz

1.2k total citations
47 papers, 870 citations indexed

About

Verena Mainz is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Verena Mainz has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 870 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 18 papers in Clinical Psychology and 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Verena Mainz's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). Verena Mainz is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). Verena Mainz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Verena Mainz's co-authors include Siegfried Gauggel, Beate Herpertz‐Dahlmann, Kerstin Konrad, Thomas Forkmann, Martin Schulte‐Rüther, Gereon R. Fink, Barbara Drueke, Hans Clusmann, Maren Boecker and Judith Gecht and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Verena Mainz

45 papers receiving 860 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Verena Mainz Germany 17 505 219 207 202 102 47 870
Paolo Meneguzzo Italy 19 859 1.7× 181 0.8× 183 0.9× 191 0.9× 53 0.5× 85 1.1k
María Beatriz Jurado United States 6 222 0.4× 398 1.8× 292 1.4× 635 3.1× 39 0.4× 11 1.3k
Paul Robinson United Kingdom 12 419 0.8× 195 0.9× 54 0.3× 164 0.8× 96 0.9× 21 786
Borah Kim South Korea 19 476 0.9× 291 1.3× 351 1.7× 188 0.9× 114 1.1× 40 934
Fabien Gierski France 18 223 0.4× 117 0.5× 191 0.9× 256 1.3× 17 0.2× 64 818
Mary Desrocher Canada 15 284 0.6× 191 0.9× 128 0.6× 286 1.4× 32 0.3× 34 968
Simona Raimo Italy 22 211 0.4× 362 1.7× 136 0.7× 349 1.7× 46 0.5× 55 1.1k
Julia E. Cohen‐Gilbert United States 13 204 0.4× 132 0.6× 201 1.0× 387 1.9× 47 0.5× 24 820
Toru Uehara Japan 13 333 0.7× 164 0.7× 146 0.7× 204 1.0× 200 2.0× 26 745
Gordon Fernie United Kingdom 17 187 0.4× 195 0.9× 227 1.1× 278 1.4× 70 0.7× 31 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Verena Mainz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Verena Mainz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Verena Mainz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Verena Mainz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Verena Mainz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Verena Mainz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Verena Mainz. The network helps show where Verena Mainz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Verena Mainz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Verena Mainz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Verena Mainz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Verena Mainz. Verena Mainz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clusmann, Hans, et al.. (2025). Tumor resting-state fMRI connectivity to extralesional brain is associated with cognitive performance in glioma patients. Brain and Spine. 5. 104202–104202. 1 indexed citations
3.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2023). Validation of the factor structure of the Experiences Questionnaire using Exploratory Graph Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1250802–1250802. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gauggel, Siegfried, et al.. (2022). An English list of trait words including valence, social desirability, and observability ratings. Behavior Research Methods. 55(5). 2669–2686. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jütten, Kerstin, et al.. (2022). Self-Referential Processing and Resting-State Functional MRI Connectivity of Cortical Midline Structures in Glioma Patients. Brain Sciences. 12(11). 1463–1463. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mainz, Verena, Judith Gecht, Christian-Andreas Mueller, et al.. (2022). Development of the German social attitude barriers and facilitators to participation-scales: an analysis according to the Rasch model. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 23(1). 423–423.
7.
Gauggel, Siegfried, et al.. (2022). A Microanalysis of Mood and Self-Reported Functionality in Stroke Patients Using Ecological Momentary Assessment. Frontiers in Neurology. 13. 854777–854777. 7 indexed citations
8.
Jütten, Kerstin, Leon Weninger, Verena Mainz, et al.. (2021). Dissociation of structural and functional connectomic coherence in glioma patients. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 16790–16790. 16 indexed citations
9.
Beblo, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Self-referential processing and perspective taking in patients with a borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 140. 87–94. 4 indexed citations
10.
Drueke, Barbara, Verena Mainz, Martín Lemos, Markus Wirtz, & Maren Boecker. (2021). An Evaluation of Forced Distance Learning and Teaching Under Pandemic Conditions Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 701347–701347. 21 indexed citations
11.
Blume, Christian, Marguerite Müller, Verena Mainz, et al.. (2020). Patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy have signs of blood spinal cord barrier disruption, and its magnitude correlates with myelopathy severity: a prospective comparative cohort study. European Spine Journal. 29(5). 986–993. 20 indexed citations
12.
Gauggel, Siegfried, et al.. (2020). Ecological Momentary Assessment in Patients With an Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Study on Compliance and Fluctuations. Frontiers in Neurology. 11. 115–115. 16 indexed citations
13.
Gohmann, Robin F., Christian Blume, Mikhail Zvyagintsev, et al.. (2019). Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Changes of fractional anisotropy in the spinal cord and magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the primary motor cortex in relation to clinical symptoms and their duration. European Journal of Radiology. 116. 55–60. 10 indexed citations
14.
Gauggel, Siegfried, et al.. (2019). The Aachen List of Trait Words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 48(5). 1111–1132. 7 indexed citations
16.
Quack, Valentin, Maren Boecker, Christian A. Mueller, et al.. (2019). Psychological factors outmatched morphological markers in predicting limitations in activities of daily living and participation in patients with lumbar stenosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 20(1). 557–557. 7 indexed citations
17.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2015). Neural correlates of positive and negative performance feedback in younger and older adults. Behavioral and Brain Functions. 11(1). 17–17. 16 indexed citations
18.
Forkmann, Thomas, Marieke Wichers, Nicole Geschwind, et al.. (2014). Effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on self-reported suicidal ideation: results from a randomised controlled trial in patients with residual depressive symptoms. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 55(8). 1883–1890. 56 indexed citations
19.
Gecht, Judith, et al.. (2013). Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors. Psychological Research. 78(4). 597–607. 10 indexed citations
20.
Mainz, Verena. (2012). Influence of cue exposure on inhibitory control and brain activation in patients with alcohol dependence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6. 92–92. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026