Barbara Drueke

491 total citations
25 papers, 338 citations indexed

About

Barbara Drueke is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara Drueke has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 338 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Barbara Drueke's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers). Barbara Drueke is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers). Barbara Drueke collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Barbara Drueke's co-authors include Siegfried Gauggel, Maren Boecker, Verena Mainz, Thomas Forkmann, Anne Scherer, Judith Gecht, Christoph Hiemke, Gerhard Gründer, André Knops and Markus R. Pawelzik and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychopharmacology and Human Brain Mapping.

In The Last Decade

Barbara Drueke

23 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Barbara Drueke Germany 12 145 126 114 51 34 25 338
Tamara De Regt Australia 9 97 0.7× 78 0.6× 82 0.7× 28 0.5× 66 1.9× 13 351
Günes Sevinc United States 11 166 1.1× 154 1.2× 93 0.8× 99 1.9× 67 2.0× 16 334
Ivan Grahek United States 9 233 1.6× 131 1.0× 269 2.4× 51 1.0× 33 1.0× 15 523
Yue Shen China 8 191 1.3× 64 0.5× 139 1.2× 56 1.1× 34 1.0× 15 347
Laura Vuillier United Kingdom 12 101 0.7× 207 1.6× 77 0.7× 66 1.3× 63 1.9× 29 382
Sara Scheveneels Belgium 9 150 1.0× 131 1.0× 153 1.3× 60 1.2× 26 0.8× 18 354
Christine Macare United Kingdom 8 116 0.8× 96 0.8× 78 0.7× 27 0.5× 102 3.0× 11 326
An Raes Belgium 12 164 1.1× 119 0.9× 172 1.5× 66 1.3× 28 0.8× 23 323
Timo L. Kvamme Denmark 9 102 0.7× 140 1.1× 53 0.5× 29 0.6× 51 1.5× 29 348
Raoul Dieterich Germany 9 224 1.5× 127 1.0× 162 1.4× 33 0.6× 44 1.3× 15 370

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Drueke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Drueke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Drueke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Drueke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Drueke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Drueke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Drueke. The network helps show where Barbara Drueke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Drueke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Drueke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Drueke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Drueke. Barbara Drueke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ernstmann, Nicole, Tim H. Brümmendorf, Marc Dohmen, et al.. (2025). Family Needs in Parental Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Contextual Factors From the Perspective of Healthy Parents—Results From the Family‐SCOUT Study. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2025(1).
2.
Gauggel, Siegfried, et al.. (2025). Take a step back to see your own value: on the role of metacognition in self-esteem regulation. Frontiers in Psychology. 16. 1530008–1530008.
3.
4.
Panse, Jens, Marc Dohmen, Barbara Drueke, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of a comprehensive support program for families with parental cancer (Family-SCOUT): results of a multicenter non-randomized controlled trial. ESMO Open. 9(6). 103493–103493. 6 indexed citations
5.
Heier, Linda, Christoph Heuser, Tim H. Brümmendorf, et al.. (2024). Communication patterns in families affected by parental cancer from the healthy parents’ perspective—process evaluation of the complex intervention Family-SCOUT. Supportive Care in Cancer. 32(8). 500–500. 1 indexed citations
6.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2023). Validation of the factor structure of the Experiences Questionnaire using Exploratory Graph Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1250802–1250802. 6 indexed citations
7.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2022). Metacognitive judgements and abilities in patients with affective disorders. Current Psychology. 42(20). 16987–16999. 7 indexed citations
8.
Drueke, Barbara, Verena Mainz, Martín Lemos, Markus Wirtz, & Maren Boecker. (2021). An Evaluation of Forced Distance Learning and Teaching Under Pandemic Conditions Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 701347–701347. 21 indexed citations
9.
Antons, Stephanie, Maren Boecker, Siegfried Gauggel, et al.. (2019). Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0214652–e0214652. 3 indexed citations
10.
11.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2019). Stopping Speed in the Stop-Change Task: Experimental Design Matters!. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 279–279. 3 indexed citations
12.
Boecker, Maren, et al.. (2018). A reaction-time adjusted PSI method for estimating performance in the stop-signal task. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0210065–e0210065. 1 indexed citations
13.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2015). Neural correlates of positive and negative performance feedback in younger and older adults. Behavioral and Brain Functions. 11(1). 17–17. 16 indexed citations
14.
Gecht, Judith, Thomas Forkmann, Siegfried Gauggel, et al.. (2014). A mediation model of mindfulness and decentering: sequential psychological constructs or one and the same?. BMC Psychology. 2(1). 18–18. 38 indexed citations
15.
Forkmann, Thomas, Anne Scherer, Markus R. Pawelzik, et al.. (2014). Does cognitive behavior therapy alter emotion regulation in inpatients with a depressive disorder?. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 7. 147–147. 34 indexed citations
16.
Gecht, Judith, et al.. (2013). Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors. Psychological Research. 78(4). 597–607. 10 indexed citations
17.
Boecker, Maren, Siegfried Gauggel, & Barbara Drueke. (2012). Stop or stop-change — Does it make any difference for the inhibition process?. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 87(3). 234–243. 44 indexed citations
18.
Boecker, Maren, et al.. (2010). When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: An event‐related fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping. 32(1). 94–106. 32 indexed citations
19.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2010). Serotonergic modulation of response inhibition and re‐engagement? Results of a study in healthy human volunteers. Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental. 25(6). 472–480. 21 indexed citations
20.
Drueke, Barbara, et al.. (2009). Differential effects of escitalopram on attention: a placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study. Psychopharmacology. 207(2). 213–223. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tamara De Regt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Günes Sevinc Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ivan Grahek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yue Shen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Vuillier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sara Scheveneels Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Macare Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by An Raes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Timo L. Kvamme Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raoul Dieterich
Rankless by CCL
2026