Roelie Hempel
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Thomas R. LynchJ.H.M. TulenNico J.M. van BeverenAntonio ConvitMichiel W. HengeveldHeather O’MahenPaul MulderEunice Chen
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyPain
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Roelie Hempel
25 papers receiving 670 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Clinical Psychology 328
- Psychiatry and Mental health 189
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 159
- Cognitive Neuroscience 118
- Social Psychology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Roelie Hempel
This map shows the geographic impact of Roelie Hempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roelie Hempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roelie Hempel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roelie Hempel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roelie Hempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roelie Hempel. The network helps show where Roelie Hempel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roelie Hempel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roelie Hempel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roelie Hempel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roelie Hempel. Roelie Hempel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | The power of invalidation in consultations for chronic pain | 1 |
| 12 | 90 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About Roelie Hempel
Roelie Hempel is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (328 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (189 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (159 citations). Roelie Hempel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Lynch, J.H.M. Tulen, Nico J.M. van Beveren, Antonio Convit, Michiel W. Hengeveld, Heather O’Mahen, Paul Mulder, Eunice Chen, Katie L. H. Gray and M. W. Hengeveld. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.