Dina Collip

3.4k citations
49 papers · 2.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 25

Dina Collip

47 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Experience sampling research in psychopathology: opening ...5682009202620142020100200300400500

Peers

Dina Collip
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Biological Psychiatry 278
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 282
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 924
  • Applied Psychology 247
Replace David Kimhy with:
David Kimhy United States
Claudia J.P. Simons Netherlands
Tineke Lataster Netherlands
Ritsaert Lieverse Netherlands
Greg Perlman United States
Robin L. Aupperle United States
Eva‐Lotta Brakemeier Germany
Nicholas C. Stefanis Greece
Michael F. Pogue‐Geile United States
Rachel Loewy United States
Dina Collip relative to David Kimhy United States David Kimhy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David Kimhy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Collip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Collip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Collip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Collip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Collip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Collip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Collip. The network helps show where Dina Collip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dina Collip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Collip Line = papers co-authored together Dina Collip links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20240
3 202033
4 201913
5
Cortisol Reactivity to Daily-life Stressors in Psychosis
20181
6 201785
7 201722
8 201724
9 201745
10 201516
11 201519
12 201456
13 201435
14 2013119
15 201334
16 201330
17 201374
18 201124
19 2011135
20 201057

About Dina Collip

Dina Collip is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Energy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (22 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (21 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (278 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (282 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (924 citations) and Applied Psychology (247 citations). Dina Collip has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jim van Os, Inez Myin‐Germeys, Johan Lataster, Philippe Delespaul, Margreet Oorschot, Marieke Wichers, Evert Thiery, Cathérine Derom, Tineke Lataster and Nele Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Psychological Medicine and CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026