Veit Erlmann

2.4k citations
62 papers · 806 indexed · h-index 14

Veit Erlmann

45 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Veit Erlmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Music 406
  • Anthropology 190
  • Cultural Studies 87
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 350
Replace Philip V. Bohlman with:
Philip V. Bohlman United States
Louise Meintjes United States
Mark Slobin United States
Deborah A. Kapchan United States
John F. Szwed United States
Dan Ben‐Amos United States
Adriana Cavarero Italy
Langston Hughes United States
C. Nadia Seremetakis Greece
Brenda Farnell United States
Veit Erlmann relative to Philip V. Bohlman United States Philip V. Bohlman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Philip V. Bohlman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Veit Erlmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Veit Erlmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veit Erlmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veit Erlmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Veit Erlmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veit Erlmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veit Erlmann. The network helps show where Veit Erlmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Veit Erlmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Veit Erlmann Line = papers co-authored together Veit Erlmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20220
3 20181
4 20011
5 20011
6 199953
7 19983
8 199468
9 199413
10 19932
11 19921
12 199238
13
Ruth M. STONE. Dried Millet Breaking. Time, Words, and Song in the Woi Epic of the Kpelle. Bloomington/Indianapolis : Indiana University Press
19918
14 19911
15 19896
16 19881
17 19881
18
Konu Raabe: A Fulbe Booku Song on Rabih b. Fadlallah
19860
19 198412
20
Data on the Sociology of Hausa Musicians in the Valley of Maradi (Niger)
19811

About Veit Erlmann

Veit Erlmann is a scholar working on Music, Archeology, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Linguistics and Language, having authored 62 papers that have together received 806 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music History and Culture (24 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (18 papers), South African History and Culture (13 papers), African history and culture studies (5 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (5 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers) and African studies and sociopolitical issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (406 citations), Anthropology (190 citations), Cultural Studies (87 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (42 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (350 citations). Veit Erlmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Traci L. Johnson, Corinne A. Kratz, Deborah Durham, Liz Gunner, Carola Lentz, David B. Coplan, Philip V. Bohlman, Stephen Blum, Daniel M. Neuman and Christopher A. Waterman. Their work appears in journals such as Yearbook for Traditional Music, Ethnomusicology, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, African Studies Review and Journal of Southern African Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026