C. Nadia Seremetakis

1.6k total citations
14 papers, 667 citations indexed

About

C. Nadia Seremetakis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Nadia Seremetakis has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 667 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Anthropology and 1 paper in Communication. Recurrent topics in C. Nadia Seremetakis's work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). C. Nadia Seremetakis is often cited by papers focused on Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). C. Nadia Seremetakis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Greece and Hungary. C. Nadia Seremetakis's co-authors include Jane K. Cowan and has published in prestigious journals such as American Anthropologist, American Ethnologist and Ethos.

In The Last Decade

C. Nadia Seremetakis

11 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Nadia Seremetakis United States 8 276 214 104 83 80 14 667
Edith L. B. Turner United States 7 416 1.5× 158 0.7× 286 2.8× 70 0.8× 87 1.1× 11 817
Donald M. Lowe 9 197 0.7× 96 0.4× 90 0.9× 43 0.5× 50 0.6× 18 598
Loring M. Danforth United States 11 325 1.2× 244 1.1× 36 0.3× 121 1.5× 60 0.8× 31 743
Carlo Severi France 13 163 0.6× 195 0.9× 61 0.6× 36 0.4× 54 0.7× 52 571
Robert Borofsky United States 11 192 0.7× 155 0.7× 76 0.7× 51 0.6× 43 0.5× 23 524
Edward L. Schieffelin United States 10 226 0.8× 268 1.3× 138 1.3× 45 0.5× 76 0.9× 16 636
Jeanne Favret-Saada France 11 328 1.2× 177 0.8× 68 0.7× 97 1.2× 42 0.5× 51 657
Deborah Durham United States 12 423 1.5× 233 1.1× 44 0.4× 62 0.7× 38 0.5× 23 731
Jane Desmond United States 11 323 1.2× 66 0.3× 120 1.2× 36 0.4× 63 0.8× 27 788
David MacDougall Australia 13 299 1.1× 119 0.6× 88 0.8× 35 0.4× 42 0.5× 47 649

Countries citing papers authored by C. Nadia Seremetakis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Nadia Seremetakis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Nadia Seremetakis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Nadia Seremetakis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Nadia Seremetakis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Nadia Seremetakis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Nadia Seremetakis. The network helps show where C. Nadia Seremetakis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Nadia Seremetakis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Nadia Seremetakis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Nadia Seremetakis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Nadia Seremetakis. C. Nadia Seremetakis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (2019). Sensing the Everyday. 12 indexed citations
2.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia, et al.. (2019). The Senses Still. 3 indexed citations
3.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (2016). The Eye of the Other: Watching Death in Rural Greece. 1. 63–77. 1 indexed citations
4.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (2016). Death Drives in the City. Social Text. 34(1). 75–96. 1 indexed citations
5.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (2009). Divination, media, and the networked body of modernity. American Ethnologist. 36(2). 337–350. 10 indexed citations
6.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (2001). Toxic Beauties. Social Text. 19(3). 115–129. 9 indexed citations
7.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1996). In Search of the Barbarians: Borders in Pain. American Anthropologist. 98(3). 489–491. 12 indexed citations
8.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1994). The Senses Still: Perception And Memory As Material Culture In Modernity. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 345 indexed citations
9.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1994). Gender studies or women's studies: Theoretical and pedagogical issues, research agendas and directions. Australian Feminist Studies. 9(20). 107–118. 3 indexed citations
10.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1993). Contested Identities: Gender and Kinship in Modern Greece. PETER LOIZOS and EVTHYMIOS PAPATAXIARCHIS. American Ethnologist. 20(2). 410–411.
11.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1993). The Memory of the Senses: Historical Perception, Commensal Exchange and Modernity. Visual Anthropology Review. 9(2). 2–18. 48 indexed citations
12.
Cowan, Jane K. & C. Nadia Seremetakis. (1992). The Last Word: Women, Death, and Divination in Inner Mani.. Man. 27(4). 920–920. 196 indexed citations
13.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1990). The Ethics of Antiphony: The Social Construction of Pain, Gender, and Power in the Southern Peloponnese. Ethos. 18(4). 481–512. 26 indexed citations
14.
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. (1987). Women and Death: Cultural Power and Ritual Process Inner Mani. Canadian women's studies. 8(2). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026