African Studies Review

2.8k papers and 33.7k indexed citations

About

The 2.8k papers published in African Studies Review in the last decades have received a total of 33.7k indexed citations. Papers published in African Studies Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (898 papers), Anthropology (879 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (501 papers) specifically the topics of African history and culture studies (645 papers), African history and culture analysis (240 papers) and African studies and sociopolitical issues (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in African Studies Review are Jane I. Guyer, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, H. S. Bhola, Karin Barber, Guy Martin, Peter Geschiere, Leroy Vail, Elliot Fratkin, AbdouMaliq Simone and Mamadou Diouf.

In The Last Decade

African Studies Review

1.8k papers receiving 19.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in African Studies Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in African Studies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in African Studies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites African Studies Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in African Studies Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in African Studies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in African Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026