Valentin Crépel

1.2k citations
39 papers · 835 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Valentin Crépel

37 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Valentin Crépel
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 657
  • Condensed Matter Physics 171
  • Materials Chemistry 272
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 39
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 52
Replace Jan Gukelberger with:
Jan Gukelberger United States
Toshikaze Kariyado Japan
Jize Zhao China
Elio J. König United States
Xiao-Qi Sun United States
Stephan Plugge Germany
Jonathan B. Curtis United States
Chirag Vaswani United States
Conan Weeks Canada
Oleksandr Tsyplyatyev United Kingdom
Valentin Crépel relative to Jan Gukelberger United States Jan Gukelberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Jan Gukelberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Valentin Crépel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Valentin Crépel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Valentin Crépel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Valentin Crépel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Valentin Crépel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Valentin Crépel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Valentin Crépel. The network helps show where Valentin Crépel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Valentin Crépel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Valentin Crépel Line = papers co-authored together Valentin Crépel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2023120
2 201768
3 202256
4 202145
5 201643
6 202340
7 202340
8 202236
9 202435
10 202133
11 202233
12 202430
13 201925
14 201925
15 201924
16 201820
17 201919
18 202416
19 202515
20 202114

About Valentin Crépel

Valentin Crépel is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Geometry and Topology and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (20 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (20 papers), Quantum many-body systems (10 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (9 papers), Graphene research and applications (8 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (7 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (657 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (171 citations), Materials Chemistry (272 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (39 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (52 citations). Valentin Crépel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include Liang Fu, Nicolas Regnault, Benoit Estienne, Andrew J. Millis, Jennifer Cano, Daniele Guerci, Raquel Queiroz, Martin W. Zwierlein, R. Fletcher and Parth Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Physical Review X.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact