V.A. Moar
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 12
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management 5
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 19
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 4
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Child Nutrition and Water Access 5
-
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research 5
-
- Date Palm Research Studies 9
-
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences 4
- Co-authors
- Margaret OunstedA.J. ScottChristopher W.G. RedmanJanet CockburnLesley MutchC.W.G. RedmanA.A. CalderA. C. Turnbull
- Journals
- Early Human Development (19 papers)Acta Paediatrica (5 papers)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
V.A. Moar
42 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 626
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.0k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 149
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 239
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 207
Countries citing papers authored by V.A. Moar
This map shows the geographic impact of V.A. Moar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V.A. Moar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V.A. Moar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by V.A. Moar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V.A. Moar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V.A. Moar. The network helps show where V.A. Moar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside V.A. Moar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 16 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 73 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 52 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 40 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 65 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 29 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 180 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 87 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 77 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 8 |
About V.A. Moar
V.A. Moar is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Gender Studies, Pharmacy and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (19 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers), Date Palm Research Studies (9 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (626 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.0k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (149 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (239 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (207 citations). V.A. Moar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Ounsted, A.J. Scott, Christopher W.G. Redman, Janet Cockburn, Lesley Mutch, C.W.G. Redman, A.A. Calder, A. C. Turnbull and C.W.G. Redman. Their work appears in journals such as Early Human Development, Acta Paediatrica, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Archives of Disease in Childhood and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.