Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Composite Flux-Line Lattices Stabilized in Superconducting Films by a Regular Array of Artificial Defects
1995475 citationsM. Baert, R. Jonckheere et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by V. V. Moshchalkov
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of V. V. Moshchalkov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. V. Moshchalkov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. V. Moshchalkov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by V. V. Moshchalkov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. V. Moshchalkov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. V. Moshchalkov. The network helps show where V. V. Moshchalkov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. V. Moshchalkov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. V. Moshchalkov.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. V. Moshchalkov based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V. V. Moshchalkov. V. V. Moshchalkov is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bansal, Bhavtosh, Abdul Kadir, Arnab Bhattacharya, & V. V. Moshchalkov. (2008). \nPhotoluminescence from localized states in disordered indium nitride. Radboud Repository (Radboud University).10 indexed citations
Partoens, B., F. M. Peeters, M. Hayne, et al.. (2006). High-field magnetoexcitons in unstrained GaAs/AlxGa1-xAs quantum dots. Physical Review B. 73(15).3 indexed citations
Bruynseraede, Y., F. G. Aliev, E. Kunnen, et al.. (1997). Periodic enhancement of the electron-electron interactions and the magnetoresistance in magnetic Co/(Cr/Ag)/Co multilayers. APS.
14.
Vanacken, J., K. Rosseel, Lieven Trappeniers, et al.. (1997). Construction of the current-voltage characteristic in a 12 decade voltage window using magnetisation measurements. 985–988.2 indexed citations
15.
Puig, Teresa, Erik Rosseel, M. Baert, et al.. (1996). Vortex interactions in 2x2 antidot clusters. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 6. 295–300.9 indexed citations
16.
Brandt, N. B., et al.. (1989). GAP AT THE FERMI LEVEL IN THE INTERMETALLIC VACANCY SYSTEM TINISN, ZRNISN, HFNISN. The European Physical Journal B. 75(2). 167–171.2 indexed citations
Aliev, F. G., N. B. Brandt, Vv Kozyrkov, et al.. (1987). Metal-insulator transition of RNiSn (R = Zr, Hf, Ti) intermetallic vacancy systems. JETPL. 45. 535.7 indexed citations
19.
Moshchalkov, V. V. & N. B. Brandt. (1986). NONMAGENTIC KONDO LATTICES. Physics-Uspekhi. 149(4). 585–634.10 indexed citations
20.
Brandt, N. B., S. V. Demishev, V. V. Moshchalkov, & S. M. Chudinov. (1981). Study of hopping conductivity in GaSb. 33(11). 578–581.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.