M. Motta

828 citations
30 papers · 651 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

M. Motta

29 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

M. Motta
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Condensed Matter Physics 321
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 214
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 113
  • Materials Chemistry 263
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 43
Replace N. Haberkorn with:
N. Haberkorn Argentina
Valentina Plaušinaitienė Lithuania
А. П. Орлов Russia
R. Schneider Germany
Xue-Yang Song China
A. G. Zabrodskiĭ Russia
Chuanbing Cai China
Masao Kamiko Japan
J.Q. Li China
Qinghui Shao United States
M. Motta relative to N. Haberkorn Argentina N. Haberkorn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
N. Haberkorn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Motta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Motta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Motta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Motta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Motta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Motta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Motta. The network helps show where M. Motta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Motta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Motta Line = papers co-authored together M. Motta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007193
2 201363
3 201350
4 201345
5 200835
6 201434
7 201632
8 201124
9 201623
10 201722
11 202020
12 201917
13 201416
14 20219
15 20199
16 20208
17 20208
18 20127
19 20196
20 20075

About M. Motta

M. Motta is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 30 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (25 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (14 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (5 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (3 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (2 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (321 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (214 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (113 citations), Materials Chemistry (263 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (43 citations). M. Motta has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Belgium and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Alan H. Windle, Anna Moisala, Ian A. Kinloch, W.A. Ortiz, A. V. Silhanek, F. Colauto, V. V. Moshchalkov, J. Cuppens, T. H. Johansen and Paulo Noronha Lisboa‐Filho. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Applied, Physical Review B and Superconductor Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact