V. H. Galbraith

1.4k total citations
14 papers, 87 citations indexed

About

V. H. Galbraith is a scholar working on Classics, History and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, V. H. Galbraith has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 87 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Classics, 5 papers in History and 1 paper in Neurology. Recurrent topics in V. H. Galbraith's work include Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers). V. H. Galbraith is often cited by papers focused on Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers). V. H. Galbraith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. V. H. Galbraith's co-authors include Joseph R. Strayer, R. Allen Brown, JAMES TAIT, F. M. Stenton, Helen M. Cam and Doris Mary Stenton and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review and The English Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

V. H. Galbraith

11 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
V. H. Galbraith United Kingdom	6	36	31	16	10	9	14	87
W. Gordon Zeeveld United States	6	22 0.6×	57 1.8×	10 0.6×	9 0.9×	16 1.8×	14	105
Glanmor Williams United Kingdom	7	29 0.8×	69 2.2×	19 1.2×	11 1.1×	9 1.0×	26	106
Malcolm Vale France	5	32 0.9×	33 1.1×	13 0.8×	15 1.5×	9 1.0×	17	73
Franz Babinger	5	15 0.4×	15 0.5×	18 1.1×	24 2.4×	8 0.9×	18	66
George Fenwick Jones United States	5	30 0.8×	24 0.8×	22 1.4×	12 1.2×	29 3.2×	51	113
F. R. H. DU BOULAY United Kingdom	6	52 1.4×	44 1.4×	8 0.5×	22 2.2×	8 0.9×	21	94
J. F. Niermeyer	3	59 1.6×	51 1.6×	18 1.1×	18 1.8×	15 1.7×	7	126
John F. D’Amico	6	37 1.0×	81 2.6×	14 0.9×	29 2.9×	6 0.7×	11	111
Anthony Luttrell United Kingdom	6	50 1.4×	59 1.9×	14 0.9×	11 1.1×	19 2.1×	66	113
Hermann Goldbrunner	6	29 0.8×	57 1.8×	3 0.2×	26 2.6×	17 1.9×	41	105

Countries citing papers authored by V. H. Galbraith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. H. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. H. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. H. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. H. Galbraith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. H. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. H. Galbraith. The network helps show where V. H. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. H. Galbraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. H. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. H. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. H. Galbraith. V. H. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1982). Kings and chroniclers : essays in English medieval history. 5 indexed citations

2.

Brown, R. Allen & V. H. Galbraith. (1976). Domesday Book: Its Place in Administrative History.. The Economic History Review. 29(1). 147–147. 8 indexed citations

3.

Galbraith, V. H. & JAMES TAIT. (1974). Herefordshire domesday : circa 1160-1170. Kraus Reprint eBooks. 1 indexed citations

4.

Galbraith, V. H., Doris Mary Stenton, & F. M. Stenton. (1971). Sir Frank Stenton (1880-1967). The American Historical Review. 76(4). 1116–1116. 1 indexed citations

5.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1970). The Anonimalle chronicle, 1333 to 1381 : from a MS. written at St Mary's Abbey, York. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations

6.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1967). Notes on the career of Samson, bishop of Worcester (1096–1112)¹. The English Historical Review. LXXXII(CCCXXII). 86–101. 1 indexed citations

7.

Strayer, Joseph R. & V. H. Galbraith. (1964). An Introduction to the Study of History. The American Historical Review. 70(1). 93–93. 21 indexed citations

8.

Cam, Helen M. & V. H. Galbraith. (1962). The Making of Domesday Book. The American Historical Review. 67(4). 1006–1006.

9.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1961). The making of Domesday Book.. 24 indexed citations

10.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1959). An Autograph MS of Ranulph Higden's "Polychronicon". Huntington Library Quarterly. 23(1). 1–18. 7 indexed citations

11.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1954). Osbert, dean of Lewes. The English Historical Review. LXIX(CCLXXI). 289–302. 1 indexed citations

12.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1954). Foreword. 84. vii–vii. 1 indexed citations

13.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1953). The Modus Tenendi Parliamentum. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 16(1-2). 81–99. 5 indexed citations

14.

Galbraith, V. H.. (1951). Historical research in medieval England. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact