George Fenwick Jones
- Classics top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Co-authors
- Thomas M. GreeneBetty WoodWilliam T. JacksonMary McCarthyWilliam C. McDonaldWilliam CalinHarold E. DavisUlrich Müller
- Topics
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (12 papers)Linguistics and language evolution (6 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsAnthropologyHistory
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George Fenwick Jones
25 papers receiving 61 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Classics 30
- Anthropology 29
- History 24
- Sociology and Political Science 22
- Literature and Literary Theory 18
Countries citing papers authored by George Fenwick Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of George Fenwick Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Fenwick Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Fenwick Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Fenwick Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Fenwick Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Fenwick Jones. The network helps show where George Fenwick Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Fenwick Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Fenwick Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Fenwick Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Fenwick Jones. George Fenwick Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Spectrum Medii Aevi : essays in early German literature, in honor of George Fenwick Jones | 3 |
| 7 | Verskonkordanz zur Kleinen Heidelberger Liederhandschrift : (Lyrik-Handschrift A) | 0 |
| 8 | Verskonkordanz zur Weingartner-Stuttgarter Liederhandschrift (Lyrik-Handschrift B) | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Oswald von Wolkenstein | 2 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | El papel del beso en el cantar de gesta | 2 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About George Fenwick Jones
George Fenwick Jones is a scholar working on Classics, History and Language and Linguistics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (12 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (6 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (30 citations), Anthropology (29 citations) and History (24 citations). George Fenwick Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Greene, Betty Wood, William T. Jackson, Mary McCarthy, William C. McDonald, William Calin, Harold E. Davis, Ulrich Müller, R. M. Wilson and Phinizy Spalding. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.