United Nations

3.0k citations
55 papers · 1.3k · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Disability Rights and Representation
    • Disability Education and Employment
    • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Papers in

United Nations

45 papers receiving 1.2k citations

United Nations's Hit Papers

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2009 · 671 citations
6710+5+11Years since publication200400600

Peers

United Nations
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Safety Research 257
  • Gender Studies 161
  • Occupational Therapy 61
  • Clinical Psychology 232
  • Health 84
Replace Mark Priestley with:
Mark Priestley United Kingdom
Jennifer L. Buckle Canada
Sonya Corbin Dwyer Canada
Michael Palmer Australia
Stephen L. Schensul United States
Carrie L. Shandra United States
Karen Fisher Australia
Jean‐Francois Trani United States
Caroline C. Wang United States
Sue Middleton New Zealand
United Nations relative to Mark Priestley United Kingdom Mark Priestley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Mark Priestley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by United Nations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of United Nations's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by United Nations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by United Nations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by United Nations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by United Nations. The network helps show where United Nations may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside United Nations, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with United Nations Line = papers co-authored together United Nations links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Hit paper breakdown →
2009671
2 1992235
3 201752
4 201942
5 201334
6 201323
7 201322
8 201118
9 199617
10 201416
11 201313
12 200513
13 201711
14 201410
15 20139
16 20129
17 20157
18 19927
19 20126
20 20146

About United Nations

United Nations is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Accounting and Law, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coastal and Marine Management (4 papers), Corporate Insolvency and Governance (3 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers), Human Rights and Immigration (2 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (2 papers), Human Rights and Development (2 papers) and Corporate Law and Human Rights (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (257 citations), Gender Studies (161 citations), Occupational Therapy (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (232 citations) and Health (84 citations). Frequent co-authors include Karen Oppenheim Mason, George J. Stolnitz, Felix P. Biestek and Peter Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Population and Development Review, Studies in Family Planning, The History Teacher, United Nations eBooks and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact