UNESCO
Impact in
-
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- African history and culture studies
Papers in
-
- African history and culture studies 2
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
- African Studies and Geopolitics 2
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 2
-
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy 1
- Co-authors
- David Félix (1 shared paper)David Northrup (1 shared paper)Jonathan R. Cole (1 shared paper)Martin J. Murray (1 shared paper)D. Mackenzie Brown (1 shared paper)Alexandre Nicolas (1 shared paper)Christopher Moseley (1 shared paper)Roland I. Hall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The International Journal of African Historical Studies (5 papers)Technology and Culture (2 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Geographical Journal (1 paper)Social Forces (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
UNESCO
23 papers receiving 84 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Archeology 3
- Anthropology 21
- Sociology and Political Science 53
- Development 4
- Linguistics and Language 5
Countries citing papers authored by UNESCO
This map shows the geographic impact of UNESCO's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by UNESCO with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UNESCO more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by UNESCO
This network shows the impact of papers produced by UNESCO. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by UNESCO. The network helps show where UNESCO may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside UNESCO, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 19 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 18 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1961 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1961 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1958 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1968 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1954 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1974 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 1 |
About UNESCO
UNESCO is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 23 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), African Studies and Geopolitics (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (1 paper), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper) and Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (3 citations), Anthropology (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (53 citations), Development (4 citations) and Linguistics and Language (5 citations). UNESCO has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Félix, David Northrup, Jonathan R. Cole, Martin J. Murray, D. Mackenzie Brown, Alexandre Nicolas, Christopher Moseley, Roland I. Hall, Creighton Gabel and Daryll Forde. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Technology and Culture, The Philosophical Quarterly, Geographical Journal and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.