Tom Winnifrith
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 1
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Balkans: History, Politics, Society 4
- History top 10%
- Travel Writing and Literature 1
-
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies 1
-
- Ayn Rand and Brontë studies 11
-
- Historical and Scientific Studies 4
-
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 1
- Co-authors
- Traian StoianovichValentine CunninghamJ. Hillis MillerCyril BarrettTerry EagletonMargot S. PetersPenelope MurrayChester F. Natunewicz
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (4 papers)The Classical World (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomRussia
In The Last Decade
Tom Winnifrith
19 papers receiving 75 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Literature and Literary Theory 42
- Cultural Studies 20
- History 18
- Anthropology 15
- Philosophy 15
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Winnifrith
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Winnifrith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Winnifrith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Winnifrith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Winnifrith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Winnifrith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Winnifrith. The network helps show where Tom Winnifrith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Tom Winnifrith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 3 | Shattered eagles, Balkan fragments | 1995 | 3 |
| 4 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 0 | |
| 9 | The Philosophy of Leisure | 1989 | 8 |
| 10 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1969 | 11 |
About Tom Winnifrith
Tom Winnifrith is a scholar working on Anatomy, Cultural Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ayn Rand and Brontë studies (11 papers), Balkans: History, Politics, Society (4 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper) and Travel Writing and Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations), Cultural Studies (20 citations) and History (18 citations). Tom Winnifrith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Traian Stoianovich, Valentine Cunningham, J. Hillis Miller, Cyril Barrett, Terry Eagleton, Margot S. Peters, Penelope Murray and Chester F. Natunewicz. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Modern Language Review and The Classical World.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.