William L. Kolb
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Education
- Co-authors
- Julius GouldDaniel LernerGunnar MyrdalPaul StreetenW. Lloyd WarnerPitirim A. SorokinWilliam KornhauserAbraham Edel
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers)Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (1 paper)American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper)
- Cited by
- General PsychologySociology and Political SciencePolitical Science and International Relations
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William L. Kolb
18 papers receiving 301 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 158
- Political Science and International Relations 65
- Social Psychology 53
- Economics and Econometrics 32
- Education 25
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Kolb
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Kolb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Kolb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Kolb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Kolb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Kolb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Kolb. The network helps show where William L. Kolb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Kolb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Kolb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Kolb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Kolb. William L. Kolb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 183 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 55 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About William L. Kolb
William L. Kolb is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 20 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (1 paper) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (8 citations), Sociology and Political Science (158 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (65 citations). William L. Kolb has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Julius Gould, Daniel Lerner, Gunnar Myrdal, Paul Streeten, W. Lloyd Warner, Pitirim A. Sorokin, William Kornhauser, Abraham Edel, Talcott Parsons and Albert J. Reiss. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.