This map shows the geographic impact of Umut Al's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umut Al with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umut Al more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umut Al. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umut Al. The network helps show where Umut Al may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Umut Al
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Umut Al.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Umut Al based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Umut Al. Umut Al is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2019). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü Tezlerinin Atıf Analizi. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.5 indexed citations
Al, Umut, et al.. (2016). Bilimsel İletişimin Dikenli Yolları: Makalelerin Yayın Süreci Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr). 30(3). 449–470.2 indexed citations
Al, Umut, et al.. (2014). Kütüphan-e Türkiye Projesi: Halk Kütüphanesi Kullanım Araştırması. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 28(3). 288–307.3 indexed citations
8.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2014). Kütüphan-e Türkiye Projesi: Halk Kütüphanesi Potansiyel Kullanım Araştırması. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 28(4). 526–546.1 indexed citations
9.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2013). The Impact of Journal Self-Citation: The Case of Energy Education Science and Technology. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
10.
Al, Umut. (2012). Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri ve Türkiye'nin Yayın ve Atıf Performansı. Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr). 14(62). 1–20.6 indexed citations
11.
Al, Umut. (2012). Türk kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Velî araştırma dergisi 2008-2010. Türk Kültürü ve HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ Araştırma Dergisi. 19(61). 273–286.1 indexed citations
12.
Al, Umut. (2010). Analysis of E-book Use: The Case of ebrary. Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr). 315–329.8 indexed citations
13.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2010). Bibliyometrik Özellikleri Açısından bilig'in Değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr). 1–20.25 indexed citations
14.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2008). Sosyal bilimler tezlerinin atıf özellikleri. DergiPark (Istanbul University).1 indexed citations
15.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2008). Türkiye’de Bilimsel Elektronik Dergiler. Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr). 22(3). 308–319.5 indexed citations
16.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2007). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Profili. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 21(2). 142–163.16 indexed citations
17.
Tonta, Yaşar, et al.. (2007). The Research Impact of Open Access Journal Articles. E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II). 321–330.12 indexed citations
18.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2004). Science Citation Index'de Hacettepe Üniversitesi : 1975-2003. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
19.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2004). Türkiye’de Kütüphanelerarası İşbirliği Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr). 18(2). 119–134.
20.
Al, Umut, et al.. (2000). Internet’te Bilgi Arama Davranışları. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. 14(3). 317–331.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.