Natalie Pang

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
70 papers, 971 citations indexed

About

Natalie Pang is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Pang has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 971 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 21 papers in Communication and 10 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Natalie Pang's work include Social Media and Politics (17 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (12 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers). Natalie Pang is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (17 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (12 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers). Natalie Pang collaborates with scholars based in Singapore, Australia and United States. Natalie Pang's co-authors include Debbie Goh, Marko M. Škorić, Qinfeng Zhu, Shirley S. Ho, Alisius D. Leong, Jiemin Looi, Schubert Foo, Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar, Edson C. Tandoc and Liang Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Energy Policy and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Pang

62 papers receiving 905 citations

Hit Papers

Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Pang Singapore 15 553 456 169 98 97 70 971
Libby Hemphill United States 18 303 0.5× 365 0.8× 308 1.8× 142 1.4× 131 1.4× 69 945
Annie Waldherr Germany 12 350 0.6× 302 0.7× 203 1.2× 50 0.5× 53 0.5× 36 854
Weiyu Zhang Singapore 19 462 0.8× 309 0.7× 93 0.6× 131 1.3× 37 0.4× 70 894
Drew Margolin United States 17 634 1.1× 445 1.0× 213 1.3× 37 0.4× 71 0.7× 52 987
Anne Kaun Sweden 19 578 1.0× 365 0.8× 77 0.5× 131 1.3× 62 0.6× 64 1.0k
Lars Nyre Norway 13 377 0.7× 356 0.8× 67 0.4× 48 0.5× 68 0.7× 47 894
Silke Adam Switzerland 14 562 1.0× 541 1.2× 183 1.1× 337 3.4× 40 0.4× 51 1.3k
Lewis A. Friedland United States 17 548 1.0× 652 1.4× 186 1.1× 194 2.0× 35 0.4× 53 1.1k
Chris Peters Denmark 22 668 1.2× 919 2.0× 64 0.4× 59 0.6× 91 0.9× 46 1.4k
Gregor Wiedemann Germany 10 299 0.5× 226 0.5× 245 1.4× 41 0.4× 49 0.5× 25 814

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Pang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Pang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Pang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Pang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Pang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Pang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Pang. The network helps show where Natalie Pang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Pang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Pang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Pang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Pang. Natalie Pang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yeoh, Brenda S. A., et al.. (2024). Household Plastic Waste Management and Gender Dynamics in Circular Economies. Sociology Compass. 18(12).
2.
Ng, Irene Y. H., et al.. (2024). Campaigning for digital equality: the role of digital access attitudes in neoliberal context. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development. 35(3). 232–252. 1 indexed citations
3.
Yue, Audrey, et al.. (2023). Making do: young people and mobilities at home. Journal of Youth Studies. 28(1). 195–212.
4.
Nah, Fiona Fui‐Hoon, Jingyuan Cai, Ruilin Zheng, & Natalie Pang. (2023). An Activity System-based Perspective of Generative AI: Challenges and Research Directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15(3). 247–267. 12 indexed citations
5.
Ng, Irene Y. H., Sun Sun Lim, & Natalie Pang. (2022). Making universal digital access universal: lessons from COVID-19 in Singapore. Universal Access in the Information Society. 22(3). 1073–1083. 16 indexed citations
6.
Lim, Sun Sun, et al.. (2021). From Digital Exclusion to Universal Digital Access in Singapore. National University of Singapore. 5 indexed citations
7.
Subramaniam, Mega, et al.. (2020). Examining vulnerability in youth digital information practices scholarship: What are we missing or exhausting?. Children and Youth Services Review. 116. 105241–105241. 6 indexed citations
8.
Linnell, Jessica D., et al.. (2020). Using Theory to Develop Healthy Choices in Motion, a Comprehensive, Experiential Physical Activity Curriculum. Frontiers in Public Health. 7. 421–421. 1 indexed citations
9.
Pang, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Operational risk dependencies. British Actuarial Journal. 25. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ho, Shirley S., Alisius D. Leong, Jiemin Looi, et al.. (2018). Science Literacy or Value Predisposition? A Meta-Analysis of Factors Predicting Public Perceptions of Benefits, Risks, and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy. Environmental Communication. 13(4). 457–471. 90 indexed citations
11.
Pang, Natalie, et al.. (2017). Misinformation in a riot: a two-step flow view. Online Information Review. 41(4). 438–453. 16 indexed citations
12.
Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri, Schubert Foo, & Natalie Pang. (2016). Survey on inadequate and omitted citations in manuscripts: a precursory study in identification of tasks for a literature review and manuscript writing assistive system. 21(4). 5 indexed citations
13.
Pang, Natalie & Debbie Goh. (2016). Are we all here for the same purpose? Social media and individualized collective action. Online Information Review. 40(4). 544–559. 12 indexed citations
14.
Pang, Natalie, et al.. (2015). Seeking common ground: Coffee shops as information grounds in the context of conflict. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 52(1). 1–10. 5 indexed citations
15.
Pang, Natalie. (2014). Crisis-based information seeking: monitoring versus blunting in the information seeking behaviour of working students during the Southeast Asian Haze Crisis.. Information Research. 19. 11 indexed citations
16.
Lee, Helena & Natalie Pang. (2014). Responding to the haze: information cues and incivility in the online small world.. Information Research. 19. 7 indexed citations
17.
Ang, Peng Hwa & Natalie Pang. (2013). Globalization of the Internet, Sovereignty or Democracy: The Trilemma of the Internet Governance Forum. Revue française d’études américaines. n° 134(4). 114–127. 2 indexed citations
18.
Foo, Schubert, et al.. (2012). Developing virtual social communities : lessons drawn from two Indian social communities. 21(9). 629–35. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pang, Natalie. (2010). Cultivating the Women on Farms Gathering Community: A Digital Approach. 5. 1 indexed citations
20.
Theng, Yin‐Leng, Dion Hoe‐Lian Goh, Ee‐Peng Lim, et al.. (2004). Applying scenario-based design and claims analysis to the design of a digital library of geography examination resources. Information Processing & Management. 41(1). 23–40. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026