Udo Nabitz
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Health Information Management top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Niek KlazingaJ.A. WalburgWim van den BrinkPaul JansenMaarten W.J. KoeterKees AhausMirella MinkmanRobbert Huijsman
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Udo Nabitz
21 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- General Health Professions 238
- Management Information Systems 141
- Strategy and Management 131
- Health Information Management 120
- Economics and Econometrics 90
Countries citing papers authored by Udo Nabitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Nabitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Nabitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Nabitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Nabitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Nabitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Nabitz. The network helps show where Udo Nabitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Udo Nabitz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Udo Nabitz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Udo Nabitz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Udo Nabitz. Udo Nabitz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | [Treatment effect of an urban acute psychiatric clinic: a prospective cohort study]. | 1 |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 81 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 123 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | EFQM's new excellence model | 12 |
| 20 | 55 |
About Udo Nabitz
Udo Nabitz is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Medical Laboratory Technology and Management Information Systems, having authored 26 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (120 citations), Management Information Systems (141 citations) and General Health Professions (238 citations). Udo Nabitz has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Niek Klazinga, J.A. Walburg, Wim van den Brink, Paul Jansen, Maarten W.J. Koeter, Kees Ahaus, Mirella Minkman, Robbert Huijsman, Isabelle Fabbricotti and Gerard M. Schippers. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Affective Disorders and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.