Jaap Peen

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
115 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Jaap Peen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jaap Peen has authored 115 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Clinical Psychology, 32 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 31 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jaap Peen's work include Treatment of Major Depression (28 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (27 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (27 papers). Jaap Peen is often cited by papers focused on Treatment of Major Depression (28 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (27 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (27 papers). Jaap Peen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Jaap Peen's co-authors include Jack Dekker, Robert A. Schoevers, Aartjan T.F. Beekman, Simone Kool, Henricus L. Van, Frans de Jonghe, Gerda van Aalst, Mariëlle Hendriksen, Pim Cuijpers and Martijn Kikkert and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jaap Peen

107 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The current status of urban‐rural differences in psychiatric disorders

2009 704 citations Jaap Peen, Robert A. Schoevers et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jaap Peen Netherlands	26	1.2k	569	550	537	413	115	2.6k
Saskia van Dorsselaer Netherlands	38	1.8k 1.5×	797 1.4×	907 1.6×	1.2k 2.2×	401 1.0×	103	4.0k
Sean Hogan United States	18	1.4k 1.2×	388 0.7×	357 0.6×	605 1.1×	129 0.3×	56	3.0k
Subin Park South Korea	33	1.7k 1.4×	392 0.7×	444 0.8×	887 1.7×	121 0.3×	196	3.7k
Tomas Hemmingsson Sweden	37	811 0.7×	478 0.8×	350 0.6×	518 1.0×	449 1.1×	140	4.0k
Dina H. Lavorato Canada	30	633 0.5×	296 0.5×	462 0.8×	405 0.8×	202 0.5×	60	2.3k
Rosemary Abbott United Kingdom	24	964 0.8×	619 1.1×	624 1.1×	927 1.7×	498 1.2×	39	2.5k
Meyer D. Glantz United States	22	1.5k 1.3×	309 0.5×	415 0.8×	440 0.8×	584 1.4×	38	3.3k
Zeina Mneimneh United States	21	1.4k 1.2×	316 0.6×	853 1.6×	537 1.0×	334 0.8×	40	2.8k
Derek de Beurs Netherlands	28	1.3k 1.1×	656 1.2×	626 1.1×	289 0.5×	111 0.3×	90	2.2k
W. Alex Mason United States	35	2.1k 1.7×	265 0.5×	492 0.9×	164 0.3×	275 0.7×	151	3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jaap Peen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaap Peen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaap Peen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaap Peen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaap Peen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaap Peen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaap Peen. The network helps show where Jaap Peen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaap Peen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaap Peen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaap Peen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaap Peen. Jaap Peen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dalfsen, Jens H. van, Jeanine Kamphuis, Jaap Peen, et al.. (2025). The predictive value of insomnia for the treatment outcome of pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and combined therapy in major depressive disorder: A mega-analysis of five randomised clinical trials. Journal of Affective Disorders. 387. 119544–119544.

Spek, Nadia van der, et al.. (2023). Attachment-Based Family Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults With Suicide Ideation and Depression. Crisis. 45(1). 48–56. 3 indexed citations

Beurs, Edwin de, et al.. (2023). Alcohol use disorder treatment via video conferencing compared with in‐person therapy during COVID‐19 social distancing : A non‐inferiority comparison of three cohorts. Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research. 47(11). 2208–2217. 1 indexed citations

Dekker, Jack, Henricus L. Van, Jaap Peen, et al.. (2023). G-FORCE: the effectiveness of group psychotherapy for Cluster-C personality disorders: protocol of a pragmatic RCT comparing psychodynamic and two forms of schema group therapy. Trials. 24(1). 300–300. 2 indexed citations

Driessen, Ellen, Marjolein Fokkema, Jack Dekker, et al.. (2022). Which patients benefit from adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy to antidepressants in the treatment of depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Psychological Medicine. 53(13). 6090–6101. 7 indexed citations

Berg, Elske van den, et al.. (2022). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy-enhanced compared with treatment-as-usual for anorexia nervosa in an inpatient and outpatient routine setting: a consecutive cohort study. Journal of Eating Disorders. 10(1). 2–2. 8 indexed citations

Brauw, Maurits de, et al.. (2022). Mapping Conscience: Network Analysis Into the Differences in Maturation of Offending and Non-Offending Adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 6624X221132233–6624X221132233. 2 indexed citations

Beurs, Edwin de, et al.. (2022). A survey of depression and anxiety disorders in urban and rural Suriname. BMC Public Health. 22(1). 51–51. 6 indexed citations

Van, Henricus L., et al.. (2020). The influence of depressive symptoms on the effectiveness of a short-term group form of Schema Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for personality disorders: a naturalistic study. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 271–271. 5 indexed citations

10.

Van, Henricus L., et al.. (2020). Psychological symptoms, early maladaptive schemas and schema modes: predictors of the outcome of group schema therapy in patients with personality disorders. Psychotherapy Research. 31(7). 831–842. 9 indexed citations

11.

Bockting, Claudi, Patricia van Oppen, Henricus L. Van, et al.. (2018). The association between the number of previous episodes and modifiable vulnerability factors in remitted patients with recurrent depression. PLoS ONE. 13(11). e0206495–e0206495. 15 indexed citations

12.

Swets, Marije, Frederike Schirmbeck, Jaap Peen, et al.. (2018). Patterns of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and social functioning in schizophrenia; a replication study. Psychiatry Research. 271. 421–427. 3 indexed citations

13.

Kikkert, Martijn, Ellen Driessen, Jaap Peen, et al.. (2016). The role of avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder traits in matching patients with major depression to cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy: A replication study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 205. 400–405. 4 indexed citations

14.

Peen, Jaap, et al.. (2011). [The aftermath of the reduction in inpatient care and treatment; a retrospective study that considers the extent to which a group of chronic psychiatric patients made use of the Amsterdam mental health services].. PubMed. 53(8). 509–17. 3 indexed citations

15.

Peen, Jaap, et al.. (2011). Prevalence and risk factors for recurrence of depression five years after short term psychodynamic therapy. Journal of Affective Disorders. 134(1-3). 468–472. 15 indexed citations

16.

Dekker, Jack, Jurrijn Koelen, Henricus L. Van, et al.. (2007). Speed of action: The relative efficacy of short psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the first 8 weeks of a treatment algorithm for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 109(1-2). 183–188. 38 indexed citations

17.

Cuijpers, Pim, et al.. (2007). Sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory in outpatients. BMC Psychiatry. 7(1). 39–39. 75 indexed citations

18.

Ruhé, Henricus G., Jack Dekker, Jaap Peen, Rebecca Holman, & Frans de Jonghe. (2005). Clinical use of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: is increased efficiency possible? A post hoc comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Maier and Bech subscales, Clinical Global Impression, and Symptom Checklist-90 scores. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 46(6). 417–427. 70 indexed citations

19.

Peen, Jaap, et al.. (2004). Elderly in in-patients health care.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 10. 107–116. 1 indexed citations

20.

Dekker, Joost, et al.. (2004). Dose–effect relations in time-limited combined psycho-pharmacological treatment for depression. Psychological Medicine. 35(1). 47–58. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact