Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Ubiratan D’Ambrósio
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ubiratan D’Ambrósio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ubiratan D’Ambrósio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ubiratan D’Ambrósio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ubiratan D’Ambrósio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ubiratan D’Ambrósio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ubiratan D’Ambrósio. The network helps show where Ubiratan D’Ambrósio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ubiratan D’Ambrósio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ubiratan D’Ambrósio.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ubiratan D’Ambrósio based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ubiratan D’Ambrósio. Ubiratan D’Ambrósio is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (2010). Ethnomathematics: A Response to the Changing Role of Mathematics in Society. 25.7 indexed citations
8.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (2008). Uma resenha do livro de Ole Skovsmose: Educação Crítica: Incerteza, Matemática, Responsabilidade, tradução de Maria Aparecida Viggiani Bicudo, Cortez Editora, São Paulo, 2007.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
9.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (2008). The Program Ethnomathematics and the challenges of globalization. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 1(1). 74–82.17 indexed citations
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (2005). Armadilha da Mesmice em Educação Matemática. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 18(24). 95–109.4 indexed citations
12.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (2005). La integración de la matemática con las ciencias. Hispana. 1(1). 6.1 indexed citations
13.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (2001). What Is Ethnomathematics, and How Can It Help Children in Schools?.. Teaching Children Mathematics. 7(6).94 indexed citations
14.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (1999). La transferencia del conocimiento matemático a las colonias: factores sociales, políticos y culturales. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 22(44). 347–380.1 indexed citations
15.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (1997). Where Does Ethnomathematics Stand Nowadays. for the learning of mathematics. 17(2). 13–17.10 indexed citations
16.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (1992). Reflexões sobre História, Filosofia e Matemática. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 42–60.3 indexed citations
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (1990). The Role of Mathematics in Building a Democratic and Just Society.. for the learning of mathematics. 10(3). 20–23.21 indexed citations
19.
D’Ambrósio, Ubiratan. (1985). A Methodology for Ethnoscience: the Need for Alternative Epistemologies. 1(2). 397–410.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.