Tony Robertson

67 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Tony Robertson
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Aging 109
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 59
  • Ecological Modeling 57
  • Health 108
  • Horticulture 11
Replace Shuyan Liu with:
Shuyan Liu China
Patricia A. Wright Canada
P. T. Baker United States
John R. Battista United States
James Breen Australia
Kjell Larsson Sweden
Kathleen E. Fischer United States
Piia Karisola Finland
Shuran Li China
Dehua Wang China
Tony Robertson relative to Shuyan Liu China Shuyan Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Shuyan Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tony Robertson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Robertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Robertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Robertson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tony Robertson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Robertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Robertson. The network helps show where Tony Robertson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tony Robertson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tony Robertson Line = papers co-authored together Tony Robertson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996166
2 1981138
3 2006113
4 201293
5 201773
6 199567
7 202164
8 197358
9 200357
10 200552
11 197551
12 198051
13 201250
14 197650
15 201448
16 201347
17 201444
18 202139
19 201134
20 201232

About Tony Robertson

Tony Robertson is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Biomaterials, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Material Properties and Processing (12 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (10 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Botanical Studies and Applications (5 papers) and Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (109 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Ecological Modeling (57 citations), Health (108 citations) and Horticulture (11 citations). Tony Robertson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include R. N. Curnow, Michaela Benzeval, A. Homola, Y. M. Charters, M. J. Wilkinson, Gavin Ramsay, Paul G. Shiels, Geoff Der, Richard A. Ennos and Frank Popham. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact