Candida Fenton

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Candida Fenton
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Aging 37
  • Health 165
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 26
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 219
  • Transportation 73
Replace Mikaela B. von Bonsdorff with:
Mikaela B. von Bonsdorff Finland
Cathal McCrory Ireland
Bih‐Ching Shu Taiwan
Carol Tannahill United Kingdom
Isabel Loureiro Portugal
Henriëtte van der Horst Netherlands
P.-E. Schnabel Germany
Stefan Fors Sweden
N. L. Pedersen Sweden
Rebecca Lacey United Kingdom
Candida Fenton relative to Mikaela B. von Bonsdorff Finland Mikaela B. von Bonsdorff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mikaela B. von Bonsdorff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Candida Fenton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candida Fenton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candida Fenton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candida Fenton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candida Fenton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candida Fenton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candida Fenton. The network helps show where Candida Fenton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Candida Fenton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Candida Fenton Line = papers co-authored together Candida Fenton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010229
2 2012148
3 2014140
4 201498
5 201293
6 201479
7 201167
8 202060
9 201650
10 201126
11 201626
12 202025
13 201824
14 201823
15 201822
16 202122
17 201618
18 201715
19 20168
20 20187

About Candida Fenton

Candida Fenton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Clinical Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (37 citations), Health (165 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (219 citations) and Transportation (73 citations). Candida Fenton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include G. David Batty, Geoff Der, Ian J. Deary, Paul McCrorie, Anne Ellaway, Catherine M. Calvin, Nicola Leckenby, Brooke Roberts, Mhairi Campbell and David J. Stott. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMC Public Health, International Journal of Epidemiology, Health Technology Assessment and BMJ Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact